May 2023

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Gigafactory Texas, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Twitter is not a valid source for all of the information you added. It is also not a minor edit as you marked your edits. Please get familiar with our policies before editing anymore. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:2C63:7A5A:4C71:80C7 (talk) 03:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please explain how detailing the progress of the factory isn't constructive. Please explain how the official Tesla Inc. Twitter is not a reliable source. Please explain how other sources using the official Tesla Inc. Twitter reporting each interval of ramp-up progress to report on the progress of the ramp-up is more reliable.
I recognize my mistake in marking it as a minor edit. KeelTheFirst (talk) 04:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is the same issue as previous warning. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:2C63:7A5A:4C71:80C7 (talk) 03:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please explain how the official Tesla Inc. Twitter is not a reliable source. Please explain how other sources using the official Tesla Inc. Twitter reporting each interval of ramp-up progress to report on the progress of the ramp-up is more reliable. KeelTheFirst (talk) 04:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply