Keelan717

Extended content

August 2012 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RfB:Keelan717. To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 19:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RfB Enter your new article name here. To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC) Keelan717, you are invited to the Teahouse Hi Keelan717! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC) RfA/RfB Hello. For others to be able to see your RfA/RfB, you must transclude the request. You may do so by doing the following; Remove the <!-- and --> around subst: in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk 06:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC) In response to your feedback You appear to want to be an administrator or bureaucrat. I apologize if I offend you, but you need to spend more time editing here. A lot more time. It's waaaay too soon for you to be thinking about either of these positions. You need to demonstrate responsibility through your contributions and interactions with other editors. I can assure you that any attempt on your part to apply for these positions will end in utter rejection, even if you have prior experience on Wikia. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 12:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)   Sorry, I linked to the wrong essay above. You'll want to check out this one instead. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 13:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC) i have closed the crat request early. Sorry, but you have no chance. Rcsprinter (rap) @ 14:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Sockpuppetry Hi Keelan717, you may not be aware but Wikipedia has a policy against sock puppetry. There are a number uses of different accounts and IP address which are prohibited, this includes using them to create the illusion of support or to influence discussion as you seem to have been trying to do on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Keelan717. If you would like further information or help please feel free to ask on my talk page. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Your RfA Hello Keelan717. This is to let you know that I have closed your RfA already as unsuccessful. There is no chance that the community will promote a user with so little experience. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCauley Daye O'Connell Architects. To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul (public) 14:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Your recent edits Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Playing games Hey, you're starting to attract a lot of attention for the wrong reasons. This is a new account, but its behavior makes it clear that you're quite familiar with Wikipedia. Either you are immature and playing around, or you're an old user with an axe to grind trying to be disruptive, but either way if you continue on the same path you've been on, it will not end well for you. Please change your behavior, and start working on building the encyclopedia, because if you don't, you may be asked to leave. Consider this your final warning on the matter. --Jayron32 15:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC) September 2012 This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Successful bureaucratship candidacies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Impersonating a bureaucrat [1] Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wikipedia:RfB. To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul (public) 17:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Keelan717 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I do not remember "abusing multiple accounts" 86.42.159.227 (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: Please log in to request unblock, or we have no idea who's talking -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Keelan717 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I do not remember "vandalising multiple accounts". Keelan717 (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: Nice try. If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 18:18, 2 September 2012 (UTC)}} The reason given was "abusing multiple accounts". -- Trevj (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC) Talk page access revoked Your access to this page has been revoked due to repeated abuse of the unblock template. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 18:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC) Email access revoked Email access revoked due to abuse of the Emailuser function. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 18:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom unblock appeal

The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock.

For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Seven

Check out the Teahouse Genie Badge, awarded for solving issues on the Teahouse Wishlist.

Hello again! We have some neat updates about the Teahouse:

• We’ve added badges! Teahouse awards is a pilot project to learn how acknowledgement impacts engagement and retention in Teahouse and Wikipedia.

• We’ve got a new WikiLove Badge script that makes giving badges quick and easy. Add it here. You can give out badges to thank helpful hosts, welcome guests, acknowledge great questions and more.

• Come join the experiment and let us know what you think!

• And...for all of your great work and all of the progress that you've helped the Teahouse make, we hereby award you the Host Badge:

	Teahouse Host Badge
	Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time. Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here

Thanks again! Ocaasi 02:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCauley Daye O'Connell Architects concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCauley Daye O'Connell Architects, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, McCauley Daye O'Connell Architects

Hello Keelan717. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled McCauley Daye O'Connell Architects.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/McCauley Daye O'Connell Architects}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)