Keerukos
Welcome!
edit
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 15:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Keerukos (talk) 17:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Keerukos. Thank you for your work on Nanobubble. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
An interesting and well-referenced article that could well expand further.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Keerukos. Thank you for your work on Nanobubble. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
This page has major problems. It cites very recent literature, including some text which is verbatim reproduced in the product literature of Moleaer. It is also incredibly selective in its coverage. Bubbles are an old topic, and have roots in work dating back at least a century, but none of this is described here. One example is the paper with ~1000 cites https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210502, which includes some cited to Gibbs. This paper needs a major repair so it is an unbiased representation, as against the current version which is almost a product advert. No reinvention of the wheel please.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)