Welcome!

Hello, Kehrbykid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tim Vickers (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit
 

Thank you for contributing to our articles. If you are interested in making more contributions on cell biology and biochemistry topics, you might want to join the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject (signup here). You will be most welcome. - Tim Vickers (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


Greetings from the MCB WikiProject!

edit
 

Hello, Kehrbykid, welcome to the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject!

I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Here are some ideas on how you can help::

Read our Manual of Style, guide to citing sources and try this citation tool

Join in editing our collaboration of the month

Have a look at some related projects and resources

Improve articles on our worklist


If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, don't hesitate to post on the project talk page, or please drop me a note on my talk page.

Again, welcome!

Tim Vickers (talk) 00:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Article suggestion

edit

A long time ago I started enzyme catalysis, but never got around to expanding it with examples. This might be something you'd enjoy working on? Tim Vickers (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Of course, that's very sensible. As to choosing a lab, my unsolicited advice would be to find one where you like the people, get on OK with the boss and the project uses a variety of methods to work on an important problem. Good luck! Tim Vickers (talk) 01:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reverting vandalism

edit

Thanks for the notification. As I am not a Wikipedia admin, I can't block anybody. The best thing to do in such a situation is leave a notice on the AIV noticeboard.

Also I'd recommend you read Help:Minor edit regarding when to mark an edit as 'minor'. I noticed several of your edits marked minor that probably should not have been.

I know there is a lot to learn here and it can seem overwhelming. Don't let it intimidate you. Since you are a newcomer, people will be understanding and willing to cut you some slack. Welcome to Wikipedia and keep up the great work! ScottJ (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rollback

edit

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Smile

edit





Thanks for the quick reversion of vandalism on my page! —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 15:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

The page Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload gives some good general advice. For black-and-white line art like reaction mechanisms I tend to use PNG files with a bitmap format (reduces file size) and a resolution of 1,200 pixels per inch. Other people can make these as SVG files, which are even better, but I've never leaned that software! Tim Vickers (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:HK chimera resized.png listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:HK chimera resized.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cannabis in united kingdom edit

edit

Hi there Kehrbykid. I understand that you weren't happy with my edit on this particular page. A spliff and a joint are terms which are used interchangeably, the latter being a more common term in the United States and the former being the more popular term in the United Kingdom; hence the reason why I changed the text on the image considering the page is about Cannabis in the UK, as the majority of people from my country (UK) refer to a cannabis cigarette using the word 'spliff' rather than a 'joint' which is a very American term. I hope you now understand why this particular word would be a more appropriate choice of slang than the American term.

Here are some quotes taken from the Joint (cannabis) page:

'Though all joints customarily contain cannabis,[6] regional differences have been noted. In Europe, certain Commonwealth nations, and more recently North America, joints, or spliffs,[7] typically include a bit of rolled cigarette packet cardboard or business card in one end to serve as a mouthpiece.'

'The term 'spliff' is a West Indian word of Jamaican English origin but has spread to several western countries, particularly the UK, and many countries in Europe.'

Thank you for your time.

Lootera edit

edit

I have no idea why people who control Wikipedia entries are so defensive about articles. It was an edit that made the sentence grammatically correct and better to read. If that is not "constructive", I don't know what is.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:01, Wednesday, November 27, 2024 (UTC)


Responded to you

edit

Well sorry for the rice burner thing just a little peeved off because a toyota camry slamed into a telephone pole on my street I deleted them thank you for reminding me — Preceding unsigned comment added by FirebirdMC (talkcontribs) 18:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thank you for the quick work at the PhreakNIC article.[1] I was giving a talk on Wikipedia, and one of the audience members (without my knowledge) chose to vandalize the article during my talk. When it was pointed out, I was hoping that someone such as yourself would quickly revert the edit, which was exactly what happened, and then I used it as an example of how these processes work on Wikipedia. I and the audience went and looked at the warning template, and it was all fascinating to the audience, and I was very glad that you chose a gentle response.[2] So I just wanted to say thanks for your timely and courteous actions, good job! --Elonka 19:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:181.61.17.2

edit

Thanks for helping to clean up his mess. We edit-conflicted, with you giving him a level4 warning while I was blocking him. Hope you don't mind my pushing that button. DMacks (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit
  Thanks for helping me on wiki.
You helped me a lot on wiki.Thanks a lot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'll keep trying to do better.Thanks!!!!! Sparklepuppypup (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Anti-Vandalism

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
keep up the good work! Becky Sayles (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Don't Post Warnings without Reverting the Content in Question

edit

I noticed you posted a warning on User talk:67.87.167.109 about a bad edit they made on Bad Girls Club (season 11) which said you reverted their edit. But the edit was never reverted. I have since fixed this but in future try to first revert the edit in question, then post a warning. Thanks!EoRdE6 (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reply Kehrbykid (talk) 19:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yep I had just noticed that, so sorry my reversion was at [3]EoRdE6 (talk) 19:09, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
There ought to be a barnstar for making gracious apologies, and yours would make a good example for how to do it. Thanks for the quick response, and thank you for being an asset to the community. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quixotic plea

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 06:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Kehrbykid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply