Kemiv
Welcome!
edit
|
VHHS
edit- I've noticed your generous additions to the article on Vestavia Hills High School. As a fellow editor, I hope I can work with you to improve the article. A couple of things I've noticed that you may want to reconsider: (1) Listing every course taught doesn't add much to the kind of information people use an encyclopedia for (See WP:NOT). If the information is accessible (and kept up to date) on the school website, a simple link would be a much better use of our resources. (2) Information on average SAT scores, etc, should be cited to a verifiable reference (See WP:A). I've done some condensing and I hope you'll understand my reasoning. --Dystopos 02:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Modulo (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Children of the Gods
editWas this edit an accident? Matthew 14:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Western Shield
editWhy did you revert my edit? The text clearly had nothing to do with the subject of the article. --Michael Johnson 00:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Seconded. Please don't add material which has nothing to do with the article. If you wish to discuss this further, please take it to talk:Western Shield before adding it back in. Thanks. —Moondyne 01:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Userbox
editIt doesn't count my edits. I do. (Or rather, interiot's edit counter does). Then I put the number in a home-made box, which you can view by looking at the edit screen on my user page. --Dystopos 13:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
editDear Kemiv,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 12:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy
editI just deleted references to "minor characters" which are not characters and do not deserve mention in the article. You restored them. Please read the discussion page before making any such edits. It is clearly stated there what will be considered to be a character and what will not. Thank you. -- Elaich 22:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't know any other way to contact you but I need to tell you that I didn't know that I really changed it. Also, The official currency of Madagascar is really the Malagasy franc, not ariary. Sorry I had to contact you this way. I'm new to this site.
-MazDUDE
Your recent sput of minor edits
editI assume that you have been rushing to make extra edits to meet the minimum limit for substantive edits required to be given VandalProof!. However in your rush for quantity you have missed a high proportion of bad edits in articles to which you have added minor and frequently redundant linkings. Just go look in detail at the last few dozen of your contribtions to see how many of yours still stand.
Although your edits have not been bad they have often inadvertantly or carelessly been hiding vandalism, and in saying "not bad" I do not say they have been good because many have added redundant links. If you want to show your dedication to fighting vandals and believe me good guys are needed I suggest a week or so with this list here start at the bottom every day and work up to the present date time looking for new edits that are not of sufficient notability to be listed on a "this day in history" page. Please forgive me if my tone seems harsh but fighting vandals is not just the easy bits it requires dedication. --Drappel 17:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
editThank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kemiv. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that, in your recent vandal-fighting efforts, you have failed to warn the editors appropriately.
Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 07:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
WP Alabama
editHi Kemiv! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your excellent edits on Alabama related articles. We need your help at the Alabama WikiProject! This is a new WikiProject and there is much work to do. Please head over to the project page, add your name, and help us enhance and increase the coverage of Alabama related stories. JodyB yak, yak, yak 15:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Calculus: The Musical! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This does not appear to be a notable topic and fails WP:GNG. While conducting WP:BEFORE checks, I came across one vaguely-notability-conferring source, [1], but I don't see any other coverage in reliable secondary sources that would qualify as "significant". (There are several primary sources and school/university newspapers.)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)