I work at the South Bend Tribune and was troubled that the newspaper's only mention in Wikipedia was a stub that contained no usable information. I asked our promotions staff to remedy that. One of the staff members put in the information he thought readers would need to know -- about our circulation, coverage area, etc. Now it is labeled with three problem areas: 1. It needs additional references. 2. It reads like an advertisement. 3. It may need to be rewritten to meet quality standards. We're confused because sources are cited, more or less, when needed. We consider this fairly objective stuff -- numbers, dates, names, etc. Can someone check the South Bend Tribune listing and tell us if there truly is something wrong with the posting, or is this just a message than always pops up? KenBradford (talk) 01:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
KenBradford (talk) 02:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
