Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (December 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
•≈20+π(talk to me!) 22:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, KennyParis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! •≈20+π(talk to me!) 22:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (December 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deepfriedokra was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Deepfriedokra 04:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (March 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Picard Brothers has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Picard Brothers. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (May 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:48, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (August 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello KennyParis. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KennyParis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KennyParis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Picard Brothers has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Picard Brothers. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers (February 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chicdat was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has a long history of declines, with the exact same rationale: It is not notable. WP:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability.
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Picard Brothers has been accepted

edit
 
Picard Brothers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply