Your submission at Articles for creation: Heidrun E. Mader (October 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kentschuetz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Kentschuetz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Jimfbleak, for your kind suggestions which I appreciated. I also added another reference. The official websites of universities, I think, are reputable online sources as well, independent from the person who is presented in a wiki article. Faculty members at German Universities have to go through University webmasters who edit and check the infos; they have no direct access to the website and cannot change the content on their own.
Best, Kentschuetz Kentschuetz (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Hi Kentschuetz! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Kj cheetham, didn't know that the definition was so specific. Helpful comment! Best, Kentschuetz (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your first article

edit

Hi there, Kentschuetz, and thanks for making such a good start with your detailed biography of Heidrun E. Mader. If you feel like writing more biographies of women, you might be interested in joining us on WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Ipigott, for the encouragement and the editing,
will try to contribute more - really necessary to work on the gender gap. Kentschuetz (talk) 10:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply