User talk:Keronica Grant/sandbox 2

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 108.41.250.159
Name of student reviewer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashleydf Ashley De Freitas Date of review 5/14/13
Name of editor Keronica Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox_2
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary, and it has been peer-reviewed
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate
Wikiformatting Good, used bullets
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments Good for article editing

108.41.250.159 (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:VIMMY SEAJATAN Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox_2
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length on edit
Image (needed/appropriate) not need for this article
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting and examples
Grammar & composition Good grammar and composition
Other comments good job!

Vimmy (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:CRamel16 Date of review 5/10/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox_2
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length on edit
Image (needed/appropriate) not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to subject
Wikiformatting Good Formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar
Other comments great effort!

CRamel16 (talk) 06:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy Date of review 5/13/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox_2
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the edit was good.
Image (needed/appropriate) Not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Textbook information was accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Review of the article is accurate
Wikiformatting Added Bullets
Grammar & composition The grammar & composition is good
Other comments Good choice to add the bullets! Angela Sandy (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply