User talk:KevinLiu/Archives/2015/July
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
James Horner
Please see WP:MEMORIAL. Outpouring of support from other celebrities is irrelevant for an encyclopedia article. --Laser brain (talk) 14:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The New York Times Non-Fiction Best Sellers of 2012
The article The New York Times Non-Fiction Best Sellers of 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article contains no actual content and appears to have been abandoned after creation.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RichardOSmith (talk) 06:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- @RichardOSmith: Hi Richard, I know I created the page a few days ago and have not edited it since, appearing as though I have abandoned it. This is not the case however. I will finalize the page within the next few days. Proposal to remove the deletion tag? Thanks. KevinLiu (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- @RichardOSmith: The page is now finalized. Thanks. KevinLiu (talk) 18:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for completing it! Yep, as it was WP:PROD nominated you were absolutely entitled to remove the nomination. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ABCDEFAD✉ 17:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- @ABCDEFAD: Thanks! Will do in the future. KevinLiu (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- You are welcome to try Twinkle, a tool that can help you with anti-vandalism. It even gives you rollback buttons! Thank you for your work!--ABCDEFAD✉ 21:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)