January 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Olaf's Frozen Adventure has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Ganosis discography (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 09:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Kgan24, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 09:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Ganosis discography (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 10:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Ganosis (January 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lacypaperclip was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lacypaperclip (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Ganosis (January 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 13:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Ganosis (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 11:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Kralizec! (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgan24 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well first of all I didnt do something which is illegitimate to worth this blocking ,second of all I know my draft looks like fake but it isn't he will release music album maybe at Spring or Summer on ITunes and at the other digital disturbings and some music videos on Vevo.com but I really don't know if these sources are good enough for this Kgan24 (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Yes you did do something illegitimate, as you put it, or illegal as I would put it. you are obviously user:Kgan23 who is blocked. Creating another account while blocked is block evasion, which is not allowed. The draft, which you have attempted to post multiple times, is inadmissible for reasons repeatedly given. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But I'm not that guy maybe our user names are the same but my name is Stavros and his name's Constantine so...

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgan24 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

reason Well my name's Stavros and he's name's Constantine we're just friends and I opened this account of his IP

Decline reason:

Even if I believed that you were two seperate individuals, which I don't, this would still be a violation of our policies regarding multiple accounts (specifically WP:MEAT). Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgan24 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The thing is you don't search any further than just the IP wich can't proves something else than Constantine was oppened that account or because the usernames are similar but the persons are different. You believe ONLY what it seems not what the real thing is...which is VERY wrong!

Decline reason:

You clearly have not read the meatpuppetry policy (also linked above). Further nonconstructive unblock requests will result in talkpage access being revoked. GABgab 22:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An ordinary admin cannot access an editors IP; nor do I need to. The account Kgan23 attempted to edit the Constantine Ganosis article, or a similar one about his discography, on multiple occasions in September to December 2017. That user was blocked in December, and user:Kgan24 was created in January and has attempted to insert exactly the same articles, also on multiple occasions. Given the editing history, the timing and the closely similar name it does not take a genius to deduce that you are both the same person. Please try not to further insult our intelligence with pointless denials. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply