Kgrue
Welcome!
Hello, Kgrue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Logiweb, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Logiweb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Civility
editThe summary on this edit was rude enough to get you blocked. It was also inaccurate: I was not proposing speedy deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
To RHaworth - the meek, too meek academic author of the article has nothing to do with MY NOTE TO YOU, moron, looking unwashed an equally uneducated on your wikipedia page.
I am a totally different man (and writing from an IP that does not belong to any single human, too, although that was imposed on us by the hierarchy of ISPs) - and I can only repeat what has been said: you behave as a total brabraian, deleting a piece of knowledge (I stumbled upon in my searches) out of your tsinking ignorance.
Wikipedia, in all its un-glory, automatically censors the above (forcing me to add small changes). No wonder you feel so protected in your vandalism, mr haworth.
And I am afraid you will get vindictive and now punish the prof in spite of anything he says or does.
You are deleting a PIECE OF USEFUL KNOWLEDGE, and have no qualms about it, rid icu lous bab boon
.. and my apologies to the author of the article, if my somewhat robust talk harmed you - although of course, it is the persecutor who bears the guilt after all, not those who actively create content or protest against vandalism.
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Logiweb. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logiweb. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)