Khovrak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Khovrak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Klym Polishchuk

edit

Hello Khovrak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Klym Polishchuk for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vítor (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

WP:TRIVIA

edit

Many books mention many things. We don't put each end every blurb into wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

It appears you are spamming wikipedia with external links to the Sova Books publisher. Please don't. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear Staszek Lem, Thank you for your guidance, I am trying to reference Ukrainian literary works translated into English. I will switch to another publisher now. :) Have a great weekendUser:Khovrak (talk)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Mykola Sumtsov, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Mykola Sumtsov, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Khovrak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:The Mitten has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Mitten. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mitten (folk tale) has been accepted

edit
 
The Mitten (folk tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sova Books (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply