Ki imanu kel

want to contact you

Do you have somewhere we can talk in private, an email account or something like that? געגאנגען (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Your confrontational style at Immanuel Beit Yaakov controversy‎ is not a very encouraging start, but if you revert your unilateral changes that have not been agreed upon, I would consider it. Ki imanu kel (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I cannot stop you from contacting each other off-wiki and I will not get involved in your content dispute, but I strongly advise both of you NOT to post email addresses on user pages or anywhere else on-wiki, as all of these pages are accessible to anyone who has access to the internet. Unless there is some sort of private matter at hand here, I would also encourage you to try and resolve this dispute on-wiki, as it makes it easier for admins and other uninvolved parties to mediate if called upon. Please see WP:EMAIL for instructions on how to provide email addresses, as well as disclaimers. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Recent additions after reverted page. Please evaluate. Hoping for no more reverts.Thanks 77Line (talk) 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Ynhockey's criticisms

To Ki Imanu Kel (77Line (talk) 13:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)) Ynhockey's criticisms of the recent edits are largely technical, ie, that one should post footnotes and not website addresses in the text, overly long quotes. Can you help repost the edits better in line with Wiki style?

Important points:

The involvement of NIF, Tmura, and Achoti organizations - I have the web sites

Rav Shimon Ba'adani of Bnei Brak was the Chassidic school's final authority, I have the source

Aviad Visoli's contention that there was no cross-examination, no hearing

The concurrent founding of the Ohel Rachel and Leah School, also founded in 2007 as a Shas-Mayan school for girls, which all but escaped media attention but was noted in the Bass report

I guess I need to scan in the Bass report and parent's letters to the court, and not cite a blog, where they are in partial English and Hebrew

The original Beit Yaakov teaches the Sephardic prononciation for prayer, and no one complained of anti-Ashkenazi bias then.

There are many statments in the reverted text that have no source, such as Ezra Gerashi's alleged involvement and "the parents" contacting the media. These certainly can be questioned. Also it is not an "ongoing" set of incidents.

Many thanks.

Note that the custom at wiki is to sign with four "~" at the end of the message. I just placed a long comment at Talk:Immanuel Beit Yaakov controversy before I saw your message. I addressed some of the concerns you mentioned. I think it would be better if you comment there yourself, particularly with regard to the unsourced statements that have been "restored" (not for long, I hope). Ki imanu kel (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Recent additions after reverted page. Please evaluate. Hoping for no more reverts.Thanks 77Line (talk) 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77Line (talk • contribs)

To Ki Imanu kel

I have a gmail account now. How can I get it to you?

Becky613 (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2011 (UTC)