October 2020

edit

  Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Eurovision Song Contest, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  dummelaksen  (talkcontribs) 19:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teresa Loyzaga (Actress) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Teresa Loyzaga (Actress), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Calm (talk) 20:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teresa Loyzaga (Actress) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Teresa Loyzaga (Actress), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 21:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Teresa Loyzaga (Actress)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Teresa Loyzaga (Actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Substantially identical to Draft:Teresa Loyzaga, both have same authors as far as content goes, keep Draft:Teresa Loyzaga as it is older and has a longer edit history.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teresa Loyzaga (October 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Davidwr was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This topic is currently a redirect to Diego Loyzaga#Biography. Additional material may be at Pasión de Amor (Philippine TV series). If it turns out that this person meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines listed at WP:N, WP:BIO, and WP:NACTOR, the best thing to do is to go to Talk:Diego Loyzaga and ask if the old versions of Teresa Loyzaga should be restored. Please do not do that without a discussion first. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kidhackra! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakura School Akademi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please don't remove active deletion discussion templates, it is disruptive

edit

  Hello, I'm Davidwr. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions, specifically this edit to Sakura School Akademi, has been partially undone because part of it removed a template announcing an ongoing deletion discussion. Removing such templates during the discussion is disruptive and not allowed.

Repeated disruptive behavior can result in sanctions, including being blocked from editing some or all pages for a period of time. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Also, please don't blank ongoing deletion discussions, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakura School Akademi. That is also considered disruptive. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020

edit
 

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Sakura School Akademi. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 01:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Reply