Xing Xing Digital moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Xing Xing Digital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Ingenuity Well I Need Help With Adding A Template 75.118.96.98 (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Which template would you like help with? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Xing Xing Template Because I Don't Know How To Add Templates Yet! Kidtommee (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Do you mean an infobox? If so, you can find a guide on how to create them here. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
yeah well xing xing digital shutted down back in 2018 so I will add it into the infobox Kidtommee (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Now Know How To Put Info Box! Kidtommee (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at HIT Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ok I Guess 😕 Kidtommee (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Not only are you edit-warring, you are also unable to cite your changes. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Just Don't Like It When People Think HiT Entertainment Died In 2016 Kidtommee (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you don't like it when people think that then maybe it would be useful to cite a source for your changes. Best Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xing Xing Digital (October 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kidtommee! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xing Xing Digital (October 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 00:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xing Xing Digital (October 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Numberguy6 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ANI Notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

For Example Whenever Someone Thinks HiT Entertainment Was Defunct On 2016, It Sounds Fake (It Is Technically Fake Because
Its Mostly A Unit Now) I Have To Tell Them To Just Don't Make Fun Of Me Kidtommee (talk) 21:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
No one is making fun of you, all I am saying is that you should you cite your sources when including such information. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Need A Turtorial First Kidtommee (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps WP:CITE would be helpful. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry If The Edit Is Still Unsourced But I Am New To Wikipedia Kidtommee (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I do understand that you are new to Wikipedia, but restoring content that is unsourced is problematic, so, before restoring it, you should look at the link to the tutorial about citing sources. Best Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Mostly Use A Samsung Tablet So I Think It Would Be Better If I Do It On A Computer Kidtommee (talk) 22:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
But Where Is It? Kidtommee (talk) 22:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wait a second, shouldn't we be discussing this at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents#User:Kidtommee? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh Yeah Right Kidtommee (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you know that the content is unsourced then don't restore it. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Am Still Going To Restore It So Don't Restore Your Edit Kidtommee (talk) 22:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
As long as you continue to restore unsourced content, you will not get your wish fullfilled. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also I Need To Semi Protect It Entirely So Nobody Can Add It Back To Defunct (Not Trying To be Rude Or Something) Kidtommee (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
What Does Fullfilled Mean Kidtommee (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (HIT Entertainment) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and unsourced edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I want to be clear that if this behavior continues after the block expires you will likely be blocked indefinitely. Other editors are patiently trying to explain the issues and where you can find the information you need. It is your responsibility to learn how to edit correctly. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
What Does 72 Hours Mean? Kidtommee (talk) 23:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Will Block You Back Kidtommee (talk) 23:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
That is not possible, considering that you are not an admin and neither am I. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Stop It! Kidtommee (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:CIR or trolling.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Don't Want To Be Blocked Forever Kidtommee (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry Kidtommee (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
How Long? Kidtommee (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
The guide to appealing blocks is linked in the block notice. I strongly suggest you read it, as well as the other feedback you've been given, before requesting an unblock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Am Ignoring You Because I Can Do Whatever I Want Kidtommee (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please Don't Make It Forever Kidtommee (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I Don't Know How It Works Kidtommee (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Guess What! The More You Block Me The More You Become Rude! Kidtommee (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

El_C 00:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Xing Xing Digital

edit

  Hello, Kidtommee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xing Xing Digital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Xing Xing Digital

edit
 

Hello, Kidtommee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xing Xing Digital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Star Hill Ponies

edit
 

The article Star Hill Ponies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Star Hill Ponies for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Hill Ponies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Hill Ponies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply