User talk:Killiondude/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Killiondude. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
49.226.148.229
Did you mean to indef-block 49.226.148.229? I suspect that it may not have been your intention to indef-block an IP, and that you intended to set an expiry time, so I thought I'd bring it to your attention. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're right. I've fixed it. Killiondude (talk) 16:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Account creator permission
I noticed that you approved a request for the account creator permission and I was just wondering, what is the criteria for the permission? Thanks :) Theking17825 18:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. I gave it to a steward who I deemed to be trustworthy. For more info on the right itself and who gets it you should see WP:ACCP. Killiondude (talk) 20:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Re: What's this about?
Actually, I was going to tag it but I thought I'd give the article a few moments in case either the author blanked the page themselves or if someone improved on the article. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
Peggy Adler Reference #1 edit
Jason, Jim Bleak said that I could try a different format for the Internet access dates, so I redid the first one as an example and waited for his input (see talk @ Bxzooo). In doing so, I did not remove the news article's publication date of April 1992. That remained intact. So I do not understand your reversion of what I did, which awaited input from Jim Bleak. Please advise. Best Wishes, Bxzooo 21:05, 12 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
- Oooops! You're right. I thought the April 1992 date had remained when I looked at the preview. If it's OK, I will try Jim's suggestion again and try not to screw it up this time! Please forgive!!! Bxzooo 21:36, 12 September 2011 (UTC)(talk)
- No worries. I was confused when you had made that edit, but after your post here I figured that the 1992 removal might have been on accident. Feel free to show Jim Bleak what you were intending to do. :-) Killiondude (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind vote of confidence -- but following some of the rhetoric I have been on the recieving end of, I'm now afraid to try anything! I'd like to swap out "retrieved" with accessed and thought that by putting the access date in parenthisis, it would distinguish it from the text coming before it -- as well as give each reference a less cluttered look. I know that this is a somewhat different format than what is currently at the article. My hope, as a new editor, is to see Wikipedia continue to evolve in so many positive ways. I guess there is the part of me that believes that anything and everything can be open for improvement/evolution. If this were not so, then women would not have the right to vote and this country would still have slavery. So much for my philosophy. Anyway -- what should I do? And BTW, do you think it would be possible, somewhere down the road, to for me, or you, or someone to add some of the links -- like the domestic violence one I wrote about when I sent you all those file attachments?? Best Wishes, Bxzooo 01:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)(talk)
- Shortly after writing the above, I got the courage to try out the format I described on the first reference point. If this "survives" I'll do the rest. Best Wishes, Bxzooo 01:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
- Killiondude, SarakofVulcan has changed what I did back,with total disregard to what you and JimfBleak suggested I do. What next??? I even gave an explanation, which you can see at History. Do I change it back and get into a tug of war? You will see all the previous, related comments at the Peggy Adler and Bxzooo talk pages. Bxzooo 17:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
- Well, to be honest, I don't really see what difference it makes one way or the other. Both versions mean the same thing. The only valuable way I see to the "standard" way is that it is the "standard" way and therefore the most widely used on Wikipedia. We try to be consistent as far as article structure goes. Killiondude (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- So do I have to leave it the way it now is? Or can I re-revert it? I see others that do not have what is referred to as "standard structure" and no one seems to have changed those. Why me? Bxzooo 21:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
- Well, to be honest, I don't really see what difference it makes one way or the other. Both versions mean the same thing. The only valuable way I see to the "standard" way is that it is the "standard" way and therefore the most widely used on Wikipedia. We try to be consistent as far as article structure goes. Killiondude (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Killiondude, SarakofVulcan has changed what I did back,with total disregard to what you and JimfBleak suggested I do. What next??? I even gave an explanation, which you can see at History. Do I change it back and get into a tug of war? You will see all the previous, related comments at the Peggy Adler and Bxzooo talk pages. Bxzooo 17:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
- Shortly after writing the above, I got the courage to try out the format I described on the first reference point. If this "survives" I'll do the rest. Best Wishes, Bxzooo 01:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)
- Thanks for your kind vote of confidence -- but following some of the rhetoric I have been on the recieving end of, I'm now afraid to try anything! I'd like to swap out "retrieved" with accessed and thought that by putting the access date in parenthisis, it would distinguish it from the text coming before it -- as well as give each reference a less cluttered look. I know that this is a somewhat different format than what is currently at the article. My hope, as a new editor, is to see Wikipedia continue to evolve in so many positive ways. I guess there is the part of me that believes that anything and everything can be open for improvement/evolution. If this were not so, then women would not have the right to vote and this country would still have slavery. So much for my philosophy. Anyway -- what should I do? And BTW, do you think it would be possible, somewhere down the road, to for me, or you, or someone to add some of the links -- like the domestic violence one I wrote about when I sent you all those file attachments?? Best Wishes, Bxzooo 01:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)(talk)
- No worries. I was confused when you had made that edit, but after your post here I figured that the 1992 removal might have been on accident. Feel free to show Jim Bleak what you were intending to do. :-) Killiondude (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oooops! You're right. I thought the April 1992 date had remained when I looked at the preview. If it's OK, I will try Jim's suggestion again and try not to screw it up this time! Please forgive!!! Bxzooo 21:36, 12 September 2011 (UTC)(talk)
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
Questions
Hey man, could you be a dear and remind me to ask you something about something? I don't entirely remember what it was, save for it had something to do with this guy, but I assume I'll remember later. Probably.
Unless I already asked you whatever it was and forgot about that, too... ~ Isarra (talk) (stalk) 23:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Cambridge geonotices
Thanks for putting them up. I enlarged the meetup notice a lot though, because Rich Farmbrough drove to a past meetup from Boston, Lincolnshire, and James F. commuted into another from London! So, I feel that the geonotice needs to include at least those two places, along with all of East Anglia where no other Wikimedia meetup is closer to them than Cambridge. Thanks. Deryck C. 15:31, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Dear Killiondude
I tried to create a page for Elias Rudolph Camerarius Jr., but wiki says that there was a page by that name before that was deleted by you on 18 July 2011 due to copyvio. Could you restore the article to a subdirectory of my userspace? I will edit it to clean it up and reword it and add new content. Then when you approve, I can move it over to real wiki space. BhangraGirl (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
bobby trendy
Hi there! Its me bobby trendy Is there a servcie or company that i can hire to help do my wiki page? I got my domain name www.bobbytrendy.com back Before there were ads now its back to me again. my email bobbytrendy@aol.com thank you bobby — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.233.176.182 (talk) 04:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
Infected kittens again!! Also, hi, still alive? <3
Theo10011 (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wikilove is retarded. Also, hi. I can vouch that I'm alive. Killiondude (talk) 00:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
Excuse me?
You're all sorts of helpful. Killiondude (talk) 03:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- What's that supposed to mean? -- tariqabjotu 03:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi, thank you one more time for your help with translation of concentration game on cs.wiki. It was really helpful and your help improve our effort :) --Chmee2 (talk) 21:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! I apologize about the traveller to traveler change; I wasn't aware that the British convention was the former (learn something new every day!). Killiondude (talk) 22:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi again, I just want to inform you that we (finally) finished the memory game! Here is PDF if you want to see it. Once more thanks! --Chmee2 (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
Script fix for vector
Which one was that? I'm awake now. -— Isarra (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well now isn't this embarrassing. I went to look for the actual documentation of the js and found a link for vector's version located at user:js/6tabs-vector.js. o; Errr, thanks though! Killiondude (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ooh, and it has cool little icons rather than "edit" and "hist". So web 2.0. Killiondude (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- And this one looks to be better-coded, too. Excellent. Still has that silly spaces thing, though. -— Isarra (talk) 00:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
Include-USGov problem
Thanks, Killion, for updating {{Include-USGov}} for the sandbox. As I was preparing to update the documentation, I noticed a serious bug that affected many of the templates that called {{Include-USGov}}: if the templates given an agency and a URL, but no article, it used to create an external link under the agency name, now it doesn't .. I fixed this bug in the sandbox version --- would it be possible to recopy the sandbox up to the main template? thanks a bunch! —hike395 (talk) 09:41, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, of course! I've done it just now. Thanks for the poke; I don't have that on my watchlist. Killiondude (talk) 18:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
May I have a look at the content of Tamanu Oil before it was deleted? I'll be careful to avoid any copyvio issues in creating Tamanu oil this round. Waitak (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, no. We can't undelete copyright violations. I can give you the links the tagger gave:
- {{db-copyvio|http://www.mountainroseherbs.com/learn/oilprofile/tamanu.php}} <!--also copyvio from http://www.mountainroseherbs.com/learn/oilprofile/tamanu.php, http://www.naturalskinrepair.com/tamanu-oil.html and http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/skinactives/printadd?id=1192611&pid=11142494}} -->
- Hope that helps. Killiondude (talk) 05:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
Thanks!
Killiondude, thanks for your comment on my talkpage; I appreciate it. If you're in northern California, why don't you come visit the Wikimedia Foundation sometime? I think we are having a meetup in the office in San Francisco sometime in early February: if you might be able to come, why don't you ping Steven Walling for more details? I know your name so I assume you may know some of the staff: anyone you don't know would love to meet you :-) Thanks Sue Gardner (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
Historic District Update + some other stuff
Jason, thought you'd be interested in my addition, today, to the article about Clinton, CT's Liberty Green Historic District. I added the study, report and enabling ordinance that created this local district in which my 1726 house is situated. Additionally, I wanted to ask you, as an administrator, to check out what appears to be a new editor (Cookiehead) who posted an box with exclamation point at my bio. I replied to him/her and then with a P.S. made reference to what he/she states at his/her own user page. First, my reply to him/her: "This article was totally accepted by the Editors ages ago. And the only recent edits, which were made in December, were to bring some recently introduced references, made by another editor, into the proper Wikipedia format -- as there were some that 1) mis-stated the Newspaper headline bring cited; 2) had no link on the Internet, to the article being cited, as is required; and 3) mis-stated the & misquoted the content of the article(s) being cited.Bxzooo 19:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC)"; and now the P.S. "Following is what User Cookiehead has to say about him/herself: "I like to go round articles putting {fact} in for minor claims of no controversy whatsoever, because I'm trying to pad my edit counts. It's important to me"; and 2) I like to open up articles with absolutely no sourcing, and make spacing edits to info boxes. Article content be damned." So he/she is merely trying to rack up as many edits as possible with no regard to content. This is NOT what Wikipedia is supposed to be about. I will not quote, here, the remainder of what he/she has to say about him/herself. If you are interested, you can go to Cookihead's user page. Bxzooo 20:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)" Hope I didn't overstep my bounds, but this person sems to be trying to edit anything and everything just to tote up as many edits as possible. This, to me, is the wrong reason to be a Wikipedia editor. Hope all is well. Bxzooo 21:46, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Filemover noticeboard
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Per discussion with Magister Scienta (talk · contribs), this message has been sent to you, as a concerned editor, in compliance with rules under WP:CANVAS, as a limited extent posting. 70.24.251.194 (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
Trout
...hi.
Isn't that one prettier than {{trout}}? Isn't it? ISN'T IT? But seriously, uh, is there any way to propose a swap? -— Isarra (talk) 02:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- I think we like crap around here. Please take your improvements elsewhere! I would say ask on Template talk:Trout but I guess only a shocking 5 people watch it. Maybe start a thread there and post on WP:VPM to point people towards it? Killiondude (talk) 02:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- So... use the talkpage, but also put a note on the... pump thing? Is that what you're saying? -— Isarra (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- I see it only took about 6 weeks! [1] Killiondude (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- I never claimed competency. Not that I have the slightest idea why it's even implemented like that, unless it's really old or something, predating the link= parameter? Meh. — Isarra ༆ 14:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- I see it only took about 6 weeks! [1] Killiondude (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- So... use the talkpage, but also put a note on the... pump thing? Is that what you're saying? -— Isarra (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
Thanks for the compliment Killiondude!
Thanks for the compliment killiondude! What part of Northern California are you at? I like the trout on your talk page. Victor Grigas (talk) 05:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problem! I live near Sacramento. As for the trout, I typically stay away from fish; it was an illustration someone else posted. :-) Killiondude (talk) 06:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- It's killiondude. He stays away from fish because he secretly is one! — Isarra (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep that on the down low. Once word gets out, the world will never be the same. :v Killiondude (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- It's killiondude. He stays away from fish because he secretly is one! — Isarra (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Poorman's Talkback
Due to the downtime (someone let the server hamsters out again), I am letting you know I have replied to your post on Risker's talk page. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 09:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
The question calls for you
Hello, this question appears to elicit your response. --129.130.102.230 (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Suggestion for a successful RFA
Per our chat in IRC I'm leaving you this message.If you get a chance can you look over my past work and maybe leave me some suggestions via email. Thanks TucsonDavidU.S.A. 01:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
Images not being loaded onto Commons
Hi Killiondude. I see over at Commons that you are an administrator over there, also. This is a situation I don't feel I know enough about to handle directly with the user, so I'm asking for your help. Unregistered User:TxHC has been uploading a lot of images directly onto Wikipedia without uploading them at Commons. Here. The uploads say they were taken in 2009, but they're 2012 uploads. Assuming these are really the work of the user, they're good images that I could use on various lists of museums pages in Texas. I am also noticing as I go down the User Contributions, this editor is also creating NRHP articles with no sourcing. I am needy enough on the images to want them uploaded to Commons without knowing how to address this issue with the editor. But I'm also a little concerned about all these unsourced NRHP articles being created. Do you think this is something you could address to that editor? Please let me know. Maile66 (talk) 00:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm wondering if these images really are the intellectual property of the user who is uploading them. There's no metadata and the file sizes are abnormally small (most people don't downsize prior to uploading). Plus they uploaded a logo of an organization and claimed they were the author, so that leads me to think they're just claiming everything they upload is theirs. I'll leave them a note tomorrow, I'm about to go to bed. Killiondude (talk) 08:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- My thoughts exactly. And thanks for this. My experience with WP is not in the realm of uploading images. Handling this is beyond my reach. Have a look at that user's talk page, under the Caddo Mountains subject. Another WP editor asked TxHC to do the uploading, and referred to Wikipedia:Uploading images.Maile66 (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- It struck me, as I was looking through their contribs, that their username is simply an abbreviation of "Texas Historical Commission". I've posted a (somewhat long) thread on their talk page about their edits. Hopefully we can get some answers. :-) Killiondude (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Err, just used a Google Images search and found this photo on Facebook. The latter being uploaded about 7 months ago. Killiondude (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Just read what you wrote on TxHC talk page. Well...you're a little more quick than I am, because it never occurred to me that this user might be connected to the Texas Historical Commission. It did go through my mind that this might be one of those editors who really has good intentions, but is green. And then again, there are so many variables on why any situation is what it is. Now we know via Facebook that one of the images was lifted. I'm surprised NRHP project assessed any of those pages without wondering if the text was lifted from somewhere.
- I have one more issue I can't seem to get a response on (not by you). It would be good to get this out of the way. I've been trying to find an admin to look at this possibly minor issue - and being bounced with "try someone else", or being ignored. Here's the last post I tried (no response). My main concern is erroneous labeling as to the location of the statue. I know what went down when Hathorn got blocked for copyright violations. And I also know this particular photo isn't good enough to have been lifted from a pro. But I do think it's possible someone gave this to him, and he posted it as his own. Seriously, I think someone once said he lives in Laredo, so he'd know this statue isn't in his town. Since the statue was donated by the citizens of Puebla, Mexico, it's unlikely there would be a duplicate in Laredo. But, at the very least, it needs to be renamed over at Commons. Maybe even deleted to keep it off WP sister sites. If you are unable to assist, please point me in the right direction.Maile66 (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Just read what you wrote on TxHC talk page. Well...you're a little more quick than I am, because it never occurred to me that this user might be connected to the Texas Historical Commission. It did go through my mind that this might be one of those editors who really has good intentions, but is green. And then again, there are so many variables on why any situation is what it is. Now we know via Facebook that one of the images was lifted. I'm surprised NRHP project assessed any of those pages without wondering if the text was lifted from somewhere.
- My thoughts exactly. And thanks for this. My experience with WP is not in the realm of uploading images. Handling this is beyond my reach. Have a look at that user's talk page, under the Caddo Mountains subject. Another WP editor asked TxHC to do the uploading, and referred to Wikipedia:Uploading images.Maile66 (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
I just read TxHC's reply to you. You're quick - the person is an employee of Texas Historical Commission. Hope you mention to load any photos over at Commons. On the other issue, if you don't know what happened with Hathorn, this is the circumstances of some of it. They got him on some BLP issues. But when this hit, a ton of photos wre also in question, and oodles got deleted. Worth looking into on the Zaragoza photo. Maile66 (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. :-) Years of doing this kind of stuff does make one a little more clueful about it. I'll look into your question in the next few hours. I don't want you to think I've ignored it--I've just got to finish some other stuff up. Killiondude (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- OK. Read your reply to TxHC. I'm glad I took this to you. I don't have the knowledge to give out the kind of advice you did. Maile66 (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- On the Hathorn issue, back up at that Carchorath. Carchorath raises more questions. But I'm starting to not care about the issue. Hurts my brain. Maile66 (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hey. I took a look at Carcharoth's talk page (you linked it above) and it seems to have been straightened out, somewhat. Did I understand that correctly? Killiondude (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, everything was taken care of. Case closed. Thanks for your follow-up.Maile66 (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hey. I took a look at Carcharoth's talk page (you linked it above) and it seems to have been straightened out, somewhat. Did I understand that correctly? Killiondude (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- On the Hathorn issue, back up at that Carchorath. Carchorath raises more questions. But I'm starting to not care about the issue. Hurts my brain. Maile66 (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- OK. Read your reply to TxHC. I'm glad I took this to you. I don't have the knowledge to give out the kind of advice you did. Maile66 (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Hadilovesgaga
Can you block Hadilovesgaga (talk · contribs)? Considering this, this, this, this copyvio, and that clearly has no intentions to stop, is enough to being blocked. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Por supuesto. Killiondude (talk) 19:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Gracias :) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of Corvette DP Images
You deleted File:2012 Motorsports Corve69.jp.jpg and File:2012 Motorsports Corve22.jp.jpg. Could you please be more specific about how they did not meet the license requirements? I don't get it. Sabre ball t c 20:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- For posterity's sake (and illustration here) I'll quote the Permission field (which was also included in the metadata of the image):
License Agreement - Please read the following important information pertaining to this image. This GM image is protected by copyright and is provided for use under a Creative Commons 3.0 License for the purpose of editorial comment only. The use of this image for advertising, marketing, or any other commercial purposes is prohibited. This image can be cropped, but may not be altered in any other way, and each should bear the credit line Ò© GM Co.Ó General Motors makes no representations with respect to the consent of those persons appearing in these photos, or with regard to the use of names, trademarks, trade dress, copyrighted designs or works of art or architecture that are not the intellectual property of General Motors.
- CC-BY 3.0 (which is what the image was licensed as) completely goes against this in that commercial use is, in fact allowed, and images are alterable as long as the other provisions of the license are respected--in this case, attribution. You can read the license here. Any freely licensed images on Wikipedia must be usable in commercial aspects and must allow derivative works. Killiondude (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- That helps a lot. Thanks! --Sabre ball t c 15:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
Helen Radics page is totatlly a farce. Everything posted is in direct COPYRIGHT VIOLATION.
This person has posted nothing but lies and defamattory comments. The posting made by this person on Wiki is a shame. Nothing that is stated is of truth or worthiness. All self-praise and false claims. Please remove immediately - for all of our sakes. When you visit the person's main websites, all it contains is blasphemous boasting, self-righteous claims - all false. Close to 80% of the website contains lifted photos from all sources on the internet - no permission - claims of ownership! This is embarassing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.236.93 (talk) 05:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm sort of confused as to how you got to me, but yes that article looks to be poorly crafted. There are multiple venues to take it, Articles for Deletion being the best bet for others to see if it should stay. Hope that helps. Killiondude (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For being such a regular and active op in #wikipedia-en. Pinetalk 07:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC) |
- You are too kind. Killiondude (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
YoloArts edits
I did see the long message. I guess my frustration comes from how long it took me to add all that stuff and then I wasn't even given the chance to fix it with citations or all that. . . I understand where you're coming from, but it doesn't make it less frustrating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EJMihelich (talk • contribs) 22:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
Documentation for gadget authors
I saw you had done some work on heavily-used gadgets. We're trying to start a library for gadget authors to use. Please check it out and post any questions or comments there. -- ☠MarkAHershberger☢(talk)☣ 01:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
I've read the link given by you, WP:IINFO. Since it is a directive given by the official website and is reported in a secondary source, I think it does have some weight. Per your argument, I agree the strategies described to spread awareness should be removed, but the fact that the website encourages gardeners to spread awareness should be mentioned. How about this sentence: "WNGD's official website encourages gardeners to spread awareness about this day." A brief mention without going into trivial detail. What do you think? --SupernovaExplosion Talk 06:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- I think each and every website about every organization, company, or event is going to ask people to "spread the word" in some form or another. In that regard it's entirely non-notable and unencyclopedic. The fact that a newspaper reprinted that bit of information doesn't really have any bearing on the issue of its triviality. Killiondude (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
Problem with WP Russia assessments
I tried to assess this article as b-class: Talk:Anastasiya Vertinskaya, but for some reason it shows up as c-class, even though I put a b in the class parameter. I had the same problem here Talk:Polish–Soviet War, where I typed in a b and it showed up as c-class. I asked Greyhood (User talk:Greyhood#Problem with WP Russia assessments) about it, and he referred me to you. INeverCry 00:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Killiondude, I've addressed this same question on my talk page. If you have additional insight or a better solution, please let me know. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 29, 2012; 13:51 (UTC)
- I'm not that great with assessment templates. I just copied code over per an edit request. I might be able to work something out if I spent a lot of time on it, but I think it'd be a better use of everyone's time if a template wizard were to look at it. Killiondude (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted
I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon. It's 1-3 June and registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, just mention it in the registration form.
This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.
Our goals for the event are to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!
I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.
Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.
Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 14:51, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Shawnee
Well that's why you're again the old image back. Without inscriptions this photo look better, and you're back.--Shawnee Smith (talk) 06:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
thanks
I received serious threats. You commented on them. Let my thanks to you be commensurate with how seriously you considered my genuine concerns. Geo Swan (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for banning that member. They've been stealing sandboxes and not listening to their warnings and it's quite discouraging. It's hard to keep up with their horrific edits. So thank you very much! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. Anytime a user is doing something like that, feel free to report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Killiondude (talk) 18:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- I had intentions of doing so. I also have suspicions that an IP is the same user as Carlohotmail! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Question-form
Please stop edit warring while discussions are ongoing. It is not helpful. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware of the discussion in which you were assuming bad faith and calling others trolls for asking questions. Thank you for your help in this situation. Killiondude (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't accuse Max of trolling for asking questions, I accused him of trolling for suggesting that J-Mo doesn't know how to use a talk page and should "re-evaluate your role here" (which I would assume to mean his job). I'm happy to assume good faith up until someone starts insulting people. Kaldari (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- If one can't use a talk page (regardless of the reason why), wouldn't that require them to re-evaluate their role in trying to get people to talk to one another on Wikipedia? I'm not sure what J-Mo's job is (if it extends beyond Teahouse) but it certainly seems like MZ's post wasn't trolling, but acting out of (justifiable) anger. Killiondude (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't accuse Max of trolling for asking questions, I accused him of trolling for suggesting that J-Mo doesn't know how to use a talk page and should "re-evaluate your role here" (which I would assume to mean his job). I'm happy to assume good faith up until someone starts insulting people. Kaldari (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Re: Stop
Please don't blame me for errors on Wikipedia's part, maybe just asking me what happened instead of assuming what happened would have been a more reasonable thing to do. I am a long time Wikipedia user/member/editor, do not let the new account fool you. Remember what the teacher always said, never judge a book by its cover. You're welcome. --Zlit93 (talk) 04:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- lol. You moved something to the Help: namespace and to Wikipedia talk:<article name>. Like I said, please don't review things and make messes. Help in a manner where you can learn how to use Wikipedia first. Killiondude (talk) 05:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback Tool
Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.
For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
new sec. for mr. killion!
Hi you. I'm getting just about sick of you. After u, blocked my account I've been stalking err watching your edits. It seems most of your edits appear to be declining submissions for new article creations, talk page edits with snarky little comments telling them how they're wrong in some way. After you tell them they're wrong you will use a snarky icon like :) or :( . Im here to tell you to get off your high horse. Regards. Also please stop using the snarky comment "Misbehaving" in your block summaries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinoverst (talk • contribs) 00:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Killion, dude!
http://www.avclub.com/articles/arrested-development-will-premiere-its-entire-four,72593/ !!!! --Closedmouth (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Huzzah! Ilucm. Killiondude (talk) 22:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
So many redlinks
- Heilbron House: [2] [3] [4] [5]
- Merrium Apartments: So many. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] &c.
- Theodore Judah School: [13] [14] [15]
- Old Tavern (Sacramento, California) [16] [17] [18]
- Ruhstaller Building: [19] [20]
- Sacramento Hall of Justice: [21] [22] [23] [24]
- Stanford-Lathrop House: [25] [26] [27] [28] [29]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Killiondude (talk • contribs)
TfD RfX
I thought someone should let you know that your name is invoked in the preamble to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_April_26#RfX-notice, just in case you weren't already aware. I mentioned you in my rationale, too. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 14:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Heh. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Bethlehem, Israel?
Hi,
Is there any reason you reverted my edit changing "Israel" to "West Bank" in the article on Sacramento, California?
No entity recognizes Bethlehem as part of Israel, not even the Israeli government. The only part of the West Bank whose status as a part of Israel's national territory is disputed is East Jerusalem. As for the rest of the West Bank, including Bethlehem, Israel does not claim it, and it's internationally recognized as part of the Palestinian Territories. Stating that Bethlehem is part of Israel is factually wrong; this is not a POV statement.
If you have a good argument against this, could you state it in the talk page of the article? I made a section there regarding the Bethlehem issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.189.169 (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Here is the page that the source for Bethlehem and Sacramento being sister cities comes from: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/SisterCities/bethlehem.htm
You'll note that even this page does not claim that Bethlehem is in Israel, so I see no reason for you doing so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.189.169 (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I just replied there. Killiondude (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Sure.
ok ok take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GermanFucke (talk • contribs) 02:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
Commons gadget
Concerning commons:MediaWiki:Search-results-new-tab.js - thanks for figuring out a way to import that from the Commons to Wikipedia. Is there a way to deal with Helder's problem with it? See:
Also, is there any reason why this can not be a gadget people can turn on in preferences? --Timeshifter (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- He just wants you to replace the importScriptURI with the mw.loader.load bit. The latter is the proper way to load it now but the old way still works. With regard to the gadget, I'm not familiar with what the process to get things as gadgets is. I was going to suggest WP:Gadgets/proposals but you already started a thread there last month. You could try opening a thread on WP:VPP or WP:VPM to point people there or open a new discussion about it. Sorry I can't be of more help in that regard. Killiondude (talk) 16:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could you comment at Wikipedia:Gadget/proposals#Open search results and suggestions in new tabs? I think the discussion may need to be jump-started. What exactly is the JavaScript I should put in User:Timeshifter/common.js - I do not understand JavaScript. --Timeshifter (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- I fixed your js file. The documentation has some examples. The extent of my knowledge of js is manipulating it. I don't have that script installed so I probably wouldn't be of use in that proposal thread. I'm ambivalent about the idea of adding more to the gadgets page. As some point it gets unruly to have so many listed on one page. I think there's a script library being organized on MediaWikiwiki (see the thread some sections above where someone invited me to assist). Ideally scripts could be organized in some central location with proper documentation and people could learn how to add them to their js files. Killiondude (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! I added the new JS version to commons:MediaWiki talk:Search-results-new-tab.js#Works on Wikipedia too. As for the gadgets page length, create another tab, or add a table of contents to the gadget tab. Problem solved. Getting people to add JS to their own JS files will never be very popular. Try out the search JS. Searching actually becomes useful with it. Plus clicking the search icon on an empty form takes one to Special:Search in a new tab. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Yes, new tabs might work in preferences. I don't typically use Wikipedia's search function (I use Google with the
inurl:andsite:functions and use Wikipedia as a last resort if I can't find something due to robots.txt). Killiondude (talk) 07:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Yes, new tabs might work in preferences. I don't typically use Wikipedia's search function (I use Google with the
- Thanks! I added the new JS version to commons:MediaWiki talk:Search-results-new-tab.js#Works on Wikipedia too. As for the gadgets page length, create another tab, or add a table of contents to the gadget tab. Problem solved. Getting people to add JS to their own JS files will never be very popular. Try out the search JS. Searching actually becomes useful with it. Plus clicking the search icon on an empty form takes one to Special:Search in a new tab. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- I fixed your js file. The documentation has some examples. The extent of my knowledge of js is manipulating it. I don't have that script installed so I probably wouldn't be of use in that proposal thread. I'm ambivalent about the idea of adding more to the gadgets page. As some point it gets unruly to have so many listed on one page. I think there's a script library being organized on MediaWikiwiki (see the thread some sections above where someone invited me to assist). Ideally scripts could be organized in some central location with proper documentation and people could learn how to add them to their js files. Killiondude (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could you comment at Wikipedia:Gadget/proposals#Open search results and suggestions in new tabs? I think the discussion may need to be jump-started. What exactly is the JavaScript I should put in User:Timeshifter/common.js - I do not understand JavaScript. --Timeshifter (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
Signposts
I suggest you delete all the old Signpost notices from your talk page and archives. It will make your talk page load faster, and make it easier to find stuff. I only keep the last couple issues at most for Wikimedia Highlights on my talk page. Makes it much less unwieldy. I have the Signpost in my watchlist. I also have the latest Signpost in the top area of my talk page. Here is the wikitext: {{Signpost-subscription|left}} - each issue shows up in the same spot. No multiple copies on my talk page. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- I do need to archive. I noticed on a crappy wifi connection that it does take a bit for this page to load. As far as the Signpost, I think the "new message" bar forces me to read it. Otherwise I probably would be too lazy. Also, it's sort of a nice old-fashioned Wikipedia tradition. :) Killiondude (talk) 07:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Have a cookie. Pine(talk) 08:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC) |
Henrik
Is Henrik off on a break? He seems not to have contributed anything since March. We were missing stats for May 10, and now it will probably miss on today's stats too. Maile66 (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm. Well the source data is there so it's not the WMF's fault. Try emailing. Sometimes he doesn't respond but he gets the message and fixes things. Killiondude (talk) 01:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I found an error in the article (see photo). Copernicus was not a German, he was from Poland. --Top811 my talk —Preceding undated comment added 15:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC).
Interesting. Well, someone can reupload a new version of File:Germans collage.jpg that has another (famous?) German instead of our friend Copernicus. (File:Nikolaus Kopernikus.jpg) Be bold and all that.- Err, this. Killiondude (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- This is the only reason I knew it was disputed: Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars#Nicolaus Copernicus. Wikininja like what. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- The ninja-est. Killiondude (talk) 04:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Apology
|
The Anti-Flame Barnstar | |
| message As an apology, I hope you accept it and put the past behind.Deathlaser : Chat 16:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC) |
- I'm not sure what you're apologizing to me for. The only connection I can make is that I commented in this thread (and not even in a serious manner). Well, you are forgiven. Go and sin no more. Killiondude (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Placer County page
Please do not undo the changes made to the Placer County page in regards to the Placer mPOWER program. I am an employee of the county and this is a legitimate county run financing program that we wish to include for informational purposes on the page. If you have further questions you may contact our office at (530) 889-4144 or by emailing us at mpower@placer.ca.gov
Thanks.
14 May 2012 199.103.32.29 (talk) 19:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- At least you left a message. Replied at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=492569969&oldid=289533368. Killiondude (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6