Please stop adding nonsense to Antony and Cleopatra. 68.166.50.142 15:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Could you please tell me who you are (user 68.166.50.142) and who you think you are? If you have a contribution to make, would you kindly enter your thoughts on the discussion page in question, before ignorantly deleting. You cannot simply cut out chunks of text because they don't suit your narrow preconceptions about what Shakespeare wrote. One of the advantages of Wikipedia over conventional encyclopedias is that we don't have to rely on a single source of knowledge and a single point of view for each topic. It is ludicrous to suppose that there can be one single correct interpretation of a literary text that rules out all others. It is equally ridiculous to suppose that cross curricula studies have nothing to contribute literary artefacts of the era.
If you say the theory of there being a Masonic subtext to Antony and Cleopatra is nonsense you had better justify yourself. Having lectured at Cambridge university on the esoteric content of the first Elizabethan play to popularise blank verse, I do know something of what I am talking about. --Kit 16:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)