Welcome!

Hello, Kittylover0000000000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm HCA. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Claw because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! HCA (talk) 18:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crag. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Crag. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Claw. DVdm (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kittylover0000000000 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

wrongly accused for vandalisam

Decline reason:

Per below. I would also recommend this user consider changing their username after any unblock as that's a few too many zeroes to remember the exact number. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ggirl 20:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

  • You weren't accused of vandalisam, but of disruptive editing. Perhaps you can look at the many talk page messages and the edit summaries of those who reverted you to see what's going on. Drmies (talk) 23:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply