User talk:Kjp993/Archives/2009/August

Jack Chambers Public School

I just created a redirect from Jack Chamber's Public School to Jack Chambers Public School. In case you don't know, in the future you can just use the move tool to retitle rather than copy into a new article and have two identical articles. Cheers. freshacconci talktalk 21:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Rollback request

Hi, could you post your request on the main Requests for permissions page? I would appreciate some outside feedback with this request. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 09:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hello Kjp993, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 19:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Quantum Leap episodes

Hey there, thanks for adding the episode articles, could you toss a {{WikiProject Television |small= |importance= (High, Mid, Low, NA)|class= (FA, FL, A, GA, B, C, Start, Stub, List, Cat, or Template)}} template on the talk pages as you create them? -Falcon8765 (talk) 01:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page List of Quantum Leap episodes. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Young Sherlocks

Thank you for addressing that.(75.69.241.91 (talk) 18:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC))

Your incorrect edit summary with AWB

I saw you edit the article of Gyeongju Seokbinggo with the incorrect summary clean up and re-categorisation per CFD, added orphan tag using AWB. I see that you tagged the orphan template to the freshly created article but not see any "cleanup" and "re-categorisation". I appreciate your effort to do WikiGnoming a lot of articles in a short period of time, however, your incorrect edit summary made me wonder to see if there was an ongoing CFD discussion, but nothing. AWB is a nice tool for assistance, but that does not explain other things in your edit summary. Anyway, I removed the ugly orphan tag, since it is linked to another article, and I'm in the middle of creating a related article to the article in question. So regards.--Caspian blue 01:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I also looked you up for the same reason. It is not surprising that a new article is a orphan for a few hours. And like Caspian blue, I could see no evidence of cleanup, etc. Anyway, the article's progressed a lot since you saw it a couple of days ago.Ipigott (talk) 13:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)