Knicksnyc

Marc Mysterio

Add the material after you are able to demonstrate that the material has been published in reliable sources. Not before.—Kww(talk) 02:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice, moving forward. Enjoy your Sunday Evening.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, Knicksnyc. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating WP:3RR and personal attacks, as you did at Marc Mysterio. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 03:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Promotion

I was a little surprised to come back from the movies and find out that you had been blocked while I was away, but only a little surprised. Your comments about my editing show the same basic misunderstanding that Mr. Mysterio himself displays when he attempts to edit his article, so I will try to explain it to you: Wikipedia is not an avenue for promoting artists. That's not what it's for. In general, the first sign of trouble is that someone is writing an article about himself, his friend, or his employer. That means that the subject isn't getting enough coverage in any reliable news outlets for anyone to notice it and add it.

The trick of contributing to a blog-type journal and then using it as a source will get your account blocked pretty quickly. It's apparent that that is what you have been doing here. If it happens again, the account that does it will be blocked. Since there's a chronic problem with the Marc Mysterio article, it's pretty likely that I will wind up protecting the article and preventing anyone from editing it for a long period of time. It doesn't seem to be a topic that attracts editors aside from Marc Mysterio or his staff.—Kww(talk) 05:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knicksnyc, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)