User talk:Knowledgegatherer23/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Knowledgegatherer23, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Cheers! Fakescientist8000 00:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!!! Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi

At IObit Uninstaller, you removed text that was too promotional; but you also removed two reviews by secondary reliable sources (TechRadar and PC World), and kept two sources: one to the developer's website, and one that seems to encourage group buying (i.e. piracy), which we should not link to under WP:COPYLINK. It would have been better to reuse TechRadar and PC World to expand the article.

I also notice you created CleanMyMac X. The article, under its main name, has been repeatedly deleted, and now requires administrator permission to re-create. You've created a new one, but it cites just one reliable source, Macworld, and fails to mention Macworld's criticism. You've also added a link to CleanMyMac X to Final Cut Pro, which is not relevant enough to belong in that article. I have to ask, given the article's past history: do you have any conflict of interest with CleanMyMac, or MacPaw? If so, you're required to disclose it (see last link). Otherwise, keep in mind that the CleanMyMac article needs more independent, reliable sourcing, and that an admin will likely need to WP:DRAFTIFY it in the meantime, as the article does currently meet our AFC criteria. Thanks DFlhb (talk) 14:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello DFlhb,

I apologize for any wrongdoings. I was not aware that CleanMyMac X has been repeatedly deleted. Why was that? To answer your question, I have no conflict of interest with CleanMyMac or MacPaw. If not already done, I will remove the link to Final Cut Pro.

Thanks for letting me know of my mistakes. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

No problem at all, and thanks for answering. The article was repeatedly deleted because it was repeatedly created without meeting the notability criteria and with an advert-like tone. This page should list all the deletions, and also see this AfD discussion. Also, I described Macworld as reliable above, but since their article contains an affiliate link, it wouldn't be considered independent, and wouldn't count towards our notability criteria. edit: I said "draftify" above, but it doesn't seem like the app meets the notability criteria, since I can't find significant, independent coverage in reliable sources (that don't have affiliate links). You might want to just work on other articles, because it would be needlessly frustrating to invest more time in an article that likely isn't notable. DFlhb (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Update: an admin will need to decide what to do with the article, given its history. Re-creating a deleted article requires strong familiarity with our policies, hence why I suggest working on other articles, due to the learning curve. Cheers, and sorry for the bother. DFlhb (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Have you submitted a request for admin attention? Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh, never mind, I see that you did. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Purple Barnstar
		For dealing with vandalism on your talk page, I present you with the Purple Barnstar. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 21:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

@Fakescientist8000 Thank you so much!!! You are amazing. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wind turbine

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wind turbine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 19:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Xiaolongbao

Please pay attention to what you are reverting. Thanks, 47.227.95.73 (talk) 00:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

@47.227.95.73 Yes, I am so sorry. I thought I was reverting what was there before. I was a bit too quick. Have a great day. 😄 Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 00:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

@47.227.95.73 When I did it again I was trying to revert my own edit, but hadn't realized you did that. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 00:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Never be afraid to ping the other person, my friend! :) Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 01:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

@Fakescientist8000 Okay. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 14:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Study invitation for recent change patrollers

Hey @Knowledgegatherer23, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

@Tzusheng Hello! I'm going to be pretty busy for the next month or so, but there's a good chance I'll be able to after that if the survey is still open. Thanks for the offer and have a great day! Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 15:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

@Knowledgegatherer23 Thank you so much for your kind reply! Have a great day, too! Tzusheng (talk) 15:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Knowledgegatherer23. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2023-08-04. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

• Re-granted with no expiry today. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)