Kolombus
February 2012
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Color depth, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Wiki13 (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
editMy nationality, which you did not correctly identify, has nothing to do with my edit on UEFA Euro 2012. Correctness in terms of Wikipedia does. I've started a discussion on the article's talk page. Please follow-up there. Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're not discussing and you're in danger of WP:3RR, neither are a good idea. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please respond at Talk:UEFA Euro 2012. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Blocked
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon::==( o ) 20:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Kolombus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have no multiple accounts i use shared conector, I understand that multiple account is not allowed in wikipedia. I have never did inappropriate edits for this site. I can confirm that I won't do anything wrong on site. I am writing this, cuz I like share with knowledge. Please unblock. I greet.
Decline reason:
We don't care if it's different people or just you - as long all of these accounts adit the same pages as you. Max Semenik (talk) 06:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kolombus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
For 6 months I have done good, quality edits on other languages of wikipedia, I have now none of other accounts on wikipedia. I gather to unblock my account. I have support financial this project, I promise to help building good, quality project which is wiki. What else can I do? Please consider my engagement:)
Decline reason:
As you say, all of your sixteen or so accounts have been blocked since last year. Tell us why you felt the need to create so many accounts, all editing in the same area.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Fine, I will tell you. One user was very agressive to the other and he often done reverts and he deleted all information abaut articles, so If people want to add useful information This User frequently took a revange to the other users. I didnt want to be an object of revenge so I edit article as another name and I was sure that violent user dont want to delete another articles that I edit. So what you wanna to do?
Kolombus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Up^^^
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 11:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kolombus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thanks for you answear. Now I understand.
Now the block is not necessary. I will NOT cause in future any damage, I will not do any reverts and other damages in wikipedia or sister projects. I promise to not disrupt any rules of wiki
I understand why I have been blocked for — many accounts and recently I didnt create any one and I promise to not create any others new
Afterwards I will do mainly translations of other languages to english. Also mainly I interest sport, technique and rail stuff so this articles mainly I will improve, I am sure I will make useful contributions. Give me a chance.
Decline reason:
I see your unblock request. Now you have only to give a sensible answer to my question posed in an earlier unblock request. Until we understand why you felt the need to create so many accounts we cannot be confident that you will not do so again.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kolombus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I see your unblock request. Now you have only to give a sensible answer to my question posed in an earlier unblock request. Until we understand why you felt the need to create so many accounts we cannot be confident that you will not do so again.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
MY LAST Answear:
Firstly:
Now I understand. Now the block is not necessary. I will NOT cause in future any damage, I will not do any reverts and other damages in wikipedia or sister projects. I promise to not disrupt any rules of wiki I understand why I have been blocked for — many accounts and recently I didnt create any one and I promise to not create any others new Afterwards I will do mainly translations of other languages to english. Also mainly I interest sport, technique and rail stuff so this articles mainly I will improve, I am sure I will make useful contributions. Give me a chance.
Secondly:
I wasn't remember all passwords so i created new accounts
Thirdly:
I didn't know that is forbidden (now I know of!)
Lastly:
One of users was very agressive to the other and he often done reverts and he deleted all information abaut articles, so If people want to add useful information This User frequently took a revange to the other users. I didnt want to be an object of revenge so I edit article as another name and I was sure that violent user dont want to delete another articles that I edit.
Is there on wikipedia any other user revieving than 'Anthony Bradbury' because he repeats always that same: We don't understand, so perhaps other will:)
Decline reason:
Your "lastly" answer explains why you created one additional account, but not sixteen. I also find it hard to believe that you forgot your password sixteen separate times.
If you are having a conflict with another user, the appropriate method of dealing with that is to seek out dispute resolution of some form; attempting to evade scrutiny will only make matters worse. Wikipedia works on building consensus, so it's much better to attempt to discuss matters with an editor who disagrees with your edits rather than to ignore them and carry on with what you were doing; that can be seen as edit warring.
I'm declining this because I'm not satisfied with the explanation you provide for multiple accounts; if that is correct, then I'm still not convinced you understand how Wikipedia works, and so unblocking you now would not be the best idea. Either way, please take some time to read through the policies I have linked to, and come back when you believe you understand them. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 18:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.