KoreanLuck
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fairyspit, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fairyspit (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Amalthea 15:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC) |
KoreanLuck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is unfair! This is power play! What did I do? This is my only account. I have been contributing and improving Wikipedia articles to the best of my ability here. I know I'm still learning, I'm new but I'm being blocked for sock puppetry because of some users fault?! Is this because of the McAvoy's lead paragraphs? Ellen Page's quote? I use enough sources in my edits from major industry websites/publications. This is completely unfair. KoreanLuck (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a checkuser block and, as such, will not be overturned by an ordinary admin. Sockpuppet accounts, in any case, are only unblocked in very exceptional circumstances. Please apply at your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello,
you know that's not true. And I don't understand why you continue down this road, this can't be fun for either of us.
As far as I can tell, there have been two concerns that led to your original block: continued uploads of copyrighted images, and edit warring. Those are both editing problems that can easily be overcome. Start discussing those concerns! All you seem to have done so far is evade them. Show that this won't be a problem in the future!
From what I can see, your current edits are useful. All it takes is that you respect the Wikipedia community and its policies, and you'll again be welcome here.
Amalthea 17:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- But I have only uploaded one image. The Aloft poster and I thought it's allowed because it's a poster anyway. What images are you talking about? Seriously. What??? I've never bad mouthed another user. I have been editing for less than a week and I've been blocked for something I don't even know meant until I was accused of it? Where is your evidence? KoreanLuck (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)