User talk:KoshVorlon/Archive 34

Archive 30

←

Archive 32

Archive 33

Archive 34

Archive 35

Archive 36

→

Archive 40

Westminster School, Dubai

Sorry, reverted one too many edits there. Dan D. Ric (talk) 14:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Looking again, I believe the edits I reverted, Ghahnsnakkavsvvs adding that the school was started by “Coolgirlxoxo,” Ghahnsnak adding "We only accept lit students," as the motto, which I see no where on the school's website, and is hardly motto-like, and finally the addition of “Not recommended,” by Lollyxoxx, were all vandalisms. I have once again reverted them. Please look before you leap. Dan D. Ric (talk) 14:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Please look at this Diff:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westminster_School,_Dubai&diff=next&oldid=756333029

I believe you reverted to Hitler here. At any rate, there was so much vandalism it was difficult to straighten out. I trusted Serols to have reverted to a good version but there was vandalism in his last. Again, the three edits I initially reverted WERE all vandals, I just didn't revert far enough.

Please accept my apology for anything you may have construed as uncivil. Dan D. Ric (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

World_Financial_Group

Hi, Kosh:

Thanks for the explanation. I read your article about World Financial Group and find it is misleading due to the following reasons.

1. Your open statement that it is an MLM company does not have legal proof. Your citation [1] does not state it. And your citation [2] is not available now.

2. You can search for statement that WFG is an MLM company. However, I presented you the reason why it is not. That is, associates in WFG does not make money by recruiting. They make money by selling products and/or provide training for other agents. The fact that associates in WFG have the privilege to recruit does not necessary mean it is a MLM company. If you do think it is an MLM company, please provide solid reasoning.

3. If you are not biased, it is good practice to include opinions on both sides.

4. Please do not under-estimate your influence to people by provide such conclusions. As I said, you do not have solid reasoning. Or you just provide affirmative citations for your opinion.

Sincerely,

Lztfas (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Larry Zang

Hi, Kosh:

Thanks for the explanation. I read your article about World Financial Group and find it is misleading due to the following reasons.

1. Your open statement that it is an MLM company does not have legal proof. Your citation [1] does not state it. And your citation [2] is not available now.

2. You can search for statement that WFG is an MLM company. However, I presented you the reason why it is not. That is, associates in WFG does not make money by recruiting. They make money by selling products and/or provide training for other agents. The fact that associates in WFG have the privilege to recruit does not necessary mean it is a MLM company. If you do think it is an MLM company, please provide solid reasoning.

3. If you are not biased, it is good practice to include opinions on both sides.

4. Please do not under-estimate your influence to people by provide such conclusions. As I said, you do not have solid reasoning. Or you just provide affirmative citations for your opinion.

Sincerely,

Lztfas (talk) 20:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Larry ZangLztfas (talk) 20:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

IP Reply

Hi, My edit was Factual, and that is all. If the facts offend, that is not my problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.139.157 (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry!

I thought that I was reverting the bad version of John Lapus... sorry! RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 16:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

federico pucciariello contribution

hello im Federico´s personal assistant, my name is Camila . i already put the contribution in english. Mr Pucciariello approved this modification because is part of his life after rugby. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.2.13.113 (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Drafts

Hi Kosh, All Drafts regardless of their content go to MFD, I believe there was a discussion or RFC about it somewhere although couldn't say where, If you disagree with it I'm afraid you'll have to fire up another RFC to get it changed, Cheers, –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 19:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

List of fictional dogs

Hi KoshVorlon. I just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your use of rollback here. You left a {{uw-test1}} warning on the user's talk page, but upon reviewing the diffs, the last one did look like a test (adding "zzz" with no edit summary), so I can see why you reverted, but the two prior edits added substantive information that got removed in the rollback. Best, Mz7 (talk) 17:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Zppix. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Jewhater420 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Just because they appear to be an vandal editor doesn't give you the right to be uncivil with them, I appreciate the anti-vandal work but you still have to follow WP:CIVIL regardless if they are an vandal or not. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 19:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Just wanted to give you a heads up that you should really fix your new signature. I think the code is broken. It looks cool, but it's screwing up the talk pages it appears on (e.g., User talk:2A00:23C4:1000:9500:146:C713:8A2F:A85C). IronGargoyle (talk) 20:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Jihad in Trinidad and Tobago

Hi Why are you reverting my changes?

I found interesting materials therfeore could add a lot of material to Jam and main page about Islam on the islands as well. Cautious (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Sir

You are a fool. If you'd like to know the actual version of events, petition the National Archives of the Federal Government of the United States. They will tell you that the information you request is classified.

If you'd like access to your history, which I am certain you do not, you will race to delete information that doesn't align with your agenda. Public opinion has exactly no relevance.

Confirm or deny that the Earthquake that caused the nuclear meltdown in Japan occurred on X/11 at X:46. My sources are senior officials in the United States Government, who think it is a joke.

Merry Christmas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.242.14.101 (talk) 14:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Cheeta

Hello, I don't like edit wars so please comment your revert at the appropriate page please. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 13:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)