Your repeated deletions to American Motorcyclist Association

edit

I have messaged the editor who added the material and references you are challenging. Please continue at Talk:American Motorcyclist Association#Outlaw and One Percentor Description. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit
 

Your recent editing history at American Motorcyclist Association shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please focus your attention on Talk:American Motorcyclist Association. As long as you work collaboratively on the talk page you can be sure you are not violating the edit warring policy. If you continue to go back and forth on the article attempting to remove material you don't like, only to have it restored by someone else, sooner or later you will violate the 3 revert rule.

Rules or no rules, Wikipedia is collaborative. Nothing on Wikipedia will stand if it is the work of only one person in isolation.

The only way you will ever make a lasting change to any article is if you can do so in cooperation with others. You need to convince others to support a common-ground version of the article. The place to do that is on the talk page. Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply