This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kparker095 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a first time wikipedia user. I truly have been going by the guidelines. I first made the Blockparty18 account but after reading the wikipedia directions they recommend to choose an unrelated account name to your topic. With that being said, I created a new account. I understand now that that was a mistake. I have not manipulated or changed any other accounts. I have been working hard at my edits and wish to appeal my block. I promise that something like this will never happen again and that I'm only trying to contribute to wikipedia. Kparker095 (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Given your other account's username, I'm going to assume that you are affiliated with Blockparty in some way. That's also pretty evident from the promotional wording of your (deleted) draft. Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising. You're also in violation of the Terms of Use for not disclosing that you're a paid editor (see WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE for details). That's not "going by the guidelines". If you are interested in contributing to Wikipedia beyond your company, you're welcome to request a new review of your block and to indicate what you want to contribute. Huon (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Boing! said Zebedee, after some quick googling I do believe that the other three (?) accounts are unrelated to these two; it seems unlikely that Kparker095 would be interested in promoting Wanderift or Lincoln Property Company. That doesn't rule out the possibility that the others also are engaged in (unrelated) undisclosed paid editing, of course. Huon (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kparker095/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Kparker095/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply