Kradangna2001

Welcome!

Hello, Kradangna2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Taweetham (talk) 03:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 01

Please complete online student training at https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students You must login and complete all five basic modules. (Wikipedia policies, ..., Finding your article) After completion of these module, we will be able to see that you have edited at least three pages on the English Wikipedia.

Special:Contributions/Kradangna2001 at this time shows that you have not finished:

• sandbox [1] (N.B. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.)
• be bold [2]
• talk page tutorial [3]

You need to be logged in on a desktop platform, so that your contributions are recorded under your account. The links above take you straight into the pages where you can launch interactive tutorials. We expect to see you create three new pages during the this training exercise. --Taweetham (talk) 03:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done Congratulations! This assignment is completed. --Taweetham (talk) 02:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 02

General instruction

• You are going to see history of pages on Wikipedia to learn how volunteers collaboratively develop content and media. We would like you to learn from the edits made by our students in the past terms. The list of terms, students and articles can be found at user:Taweetham/WEP.
• All tasks must be answered by using Special:Diff. See Help:Diff for further detailed instructions and see an example below
  • Task Read MOS:OVERLINK. Find an example of a student edit AND an edit by other where the link is removed.
  • Example answer Addition: Special:Diff/827688470/827688799 Removal: Special:Diff/827926206/827937829

Tasks

1. Read WP:NOT. Find an example of student edit on an article AND warning message that the student received on his/her talk page.
2. Read Wikipedia:Edit warring. Find an example of student edits on an article (it requires several edits to be an edit warring) AND warning that the student received on his/her talk page.
3. Read WP:COPYVIO. Find an example of a student who has been warned about it on his/her talk page. Find an example (Wikipedia diff on an article) where copyrighted media (image, VDO or sound files) is deleted from Wikimedia Commons and removed from an article.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.) --Taweetham (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Task 1: An Edit by Bamrsykp and A Warning Bamrsykp Received

Task 2: Edit by Myat T. Aung and Warning Myat T. Aung Received

Task 3: KhomchatK Receives Warning and Deletion of KhomchatK's Picture

Kradangna2001 (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kradangna2001 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for submitting this assignment. I appreciate your attempt and ability to learn from this assignment. However, all of the three answers are not right. We allow you an opportunity to resubmit by the end of Sunday 12 May (UTC+7). --Taweetham (talk) 00:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done Congratulations! This assignment is completed. --Taweetham (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 03

Please propose a topic or two that you wish to write on Wikipedia. You should read all related articles/policies on Wikipedia and provide the following information.

1. Your proposed article(s) (New or existing STUB article relating to a chemical compound, reaction, equipment or technique - or related to your major/interest. (see Category:Stub-Class Chemistry articles))
   • For new article, explain briefly why it passes WP:NOTE.
   • For existing topics, explain briefly the state/structure of the current article.
     • Is the structure & existing content appropriate?
       • If not, restructure or remove content as per WP:MOS and WP:NOT before you move to the next stage.
2. Brief outline of your contributions to the article
   • In what section & what content
     • Make sure it belongs to the article and it is encyclopedic. See WP:NOT for things that should NOT be added.
     • Make sure that it is not redundant to existing articles. Use Google search "site:wikipedia.org" rather than Wikipedia search.
   • References for the article
   • Media files (photo/VDO/drawing) to be used in the article.
     • You may suggest plan to create your own work and upload to Wikimedia Commons
     • You may use existing media on Wikimedia Commons. Use Google image search "site:wikimedia.org" rather than Wikimedia Commons search.
3. Examples/template/related articles that you will use as a model to develop your nominated article.
   • In terms of WP:MOS/formatting - your article will have similar style/format/tone to these articles.
   • In terms of content - your article will link to or will be linked from these articles.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.) --Taweetham (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

1: My Proposed Article

I'm interested in contributing to an existing page regarding Ancient Proteins. Currently, the page's meager contents are divided into the two sections: history of ancient protein studies and paleoproteonomics. The current article lacks a great amount of general information on the subject and I believe that several sections should be added, renamed, and restructured for clarity.

2: A Brief Outline of My Contributions

I would reorganize the article to contain the following sections: an introduction; history (renamed from 'history of ancient proteins'); evolution and structure; fields of study; applications and products; advantages and disadvantages; and future development. The introduction at the beginning of the article should contain a concise and clear explanation of the content covered throughout the rest of the article, as well as a more developed definition of the term (compared to the existing one). The history section should contain greater detail on the discovery of ancient proteins, the scientists that contributed to the knowledge in this field, and the experiment and research that has taken place up until the present. I'll report on crystalline structures, the chemistry behind it, and how those structures have changed overtime. In the 'fields of study' section, the details of associated/related fields can be mentioned (perhaps a brief explanation on how each field came to be can be provided as well). For 'applications', I'll look into the means by which scientists utilized/applied our knowledge on ancient proteins to obtain useful results/products. In the 'advantages and disadvantages' section, I'll look at the ways in which this study has helped increased our scientific understanding, as well as present the limitations within the field of study. Finally, in 'future development', I'll write about the plans that scientists/researchers have towards further developing the field (i.e. the prospects).

Two examples of the sources I will use (CSE format):

• Welker F, Collins MJ, ..., MacPhee RDE. 2015. Ancient proteins resolve the evolutionary history of Darwin’s South American ungulates [Internet]. Nature. [Date Cited]; 522: 81-84. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14249.
• Ma BG, Chen L, ..., Zhang HU. 2008. Characters of very ancient proteins [Internet]. Elsevier Inc. [Date Cited]; 366(3): 607-611. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X07026265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.014

Additionally, if I choose to use other forms of media at all, it will be from existing images in Wikimedia Commons.

3: Examples/Templates/Related Articles

I'll follow the neat, concise organization and paragraph structure as shown in this article regarding Bacteriophages.

I'll create internal/external links for specific terminology or concepts. Some examples are shown below:

• Proteonomics
• Lipoproteins

Kradangna2001 (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

I appreciate your hard work however the topic you selected is not a stub article according to the instruction. Please find a new topic by the end of Saturday 18th May --Teetee taw (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done Congratulations! This assignment is completed. --Teetee taw (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for your hard work. Keep trying! Taweetham (talk) 08:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 04

Your topic is approved and added to the course page. Please develop the proposal into the first draft in your sandbox.

• For existing article, you may copy some parts of the existing article to your sandbox to see how revision/integration of content would work. You will copy the code back to the article at later stage.
• For new article, you may want to copy parts of a template article to your sandbox to see what sections are necessary. The sandbox will be moved to the article namespace at later stage. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.

In all cases, do not copy more than what is necessary. For example, do not copy any categories to your sandbox. --Teetee taw (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done Congratulations! It is a good work.

ICCH224 Week 05

Your work has been reviewed. Majority of the content/formatting is ok. Please carefully move encyclopedic part of your sandbox to article namespace so that the general public can see it. Here are some tips to help you complete the transition to online editing.

1. Content/Formatting policies
   • For the purpose of this assignment, do NOT copy anything from anywhere to Wikipedia and it sister projects. You must create all of the content primarily by yourself with assistance/supervision of the instructor & the team. The content, however, must be encyclopedic & relevant and supported by reliable references.
   • The content must be in the right format and added to the right place of the article.
   • You can learn writing and formatting style from similar (but better class) articles on Wikipedia. You can find them from links/categories of your article. Learning from good examples is perhaps the best short-cut to your success.
2. Technicalities
   • Unlike sandbox, all edits will be public immediately and it is important to make sure that all of your edits are acceptable. You may use preview button and provide edit summary to help you.
   • Any "page save" on Wikipedia even outside article namespace is permanently recorded and can be retrieved by the public. Please think carefully before you click save and before you revert other people edits. No work is lost but only the latest version of the page is shown to the public. Deletion of pages (or versions of pages) is only possible by admins if it falls under Wikipedia:Deletion policy. You can request admins to do deletion or other prescribed tasks should the need arises.
   • You may want to set watchlist and notifications so that you can catch up with changes made to your article and your talk page by other editors.
3. Community interactions
   • You will be interacting with other volunteers when you make edits on the article namespace. Please respect other users in the community and assume good faith.
   • If your work is reverted or modified in any other ways, do not engage in a edit war. Rather use discussion page of your article to settle issues.
   • You may be blocked from Wikipedia for failure to observe community rules.

We hope you enjoy seeing product of your hard work read by many people in the years to come. --Taweetham (talk) 03:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

I have added some of my content to the wikipedia article on ancient proteins and will continue to make adjustments in the weeks to come :) --Kradangna2001 (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done It's a good work. You may need to make cosmetic changes to conform with WP:MOS --Taweetham (talk) 01:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Ajarn! I'll continue to edit and add content to improve the page in the weeks to come! Kradangna2001 (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 06

A volunteer Teetee taw (talk · contribs) has accepted to be your reviewer. The reviewer will be in contact with you shortly. --Taweetham (talk) 01:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Understood ka, looking forward to it! Kradangna2001 (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

I have read your contribution already, i think it is good, please keep adding more information especially the structure and evolution part, i think there are more details to it.--Teetee taw (talk) 04:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you P' Teetee! I actually have a lot more planned (the outline is written in my sandbox) and will definitely add more to the page! Kradangna2001 (talk) 01:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 07

For your information, the grading is based on the criteria below: Wikipedia contributions must meet the minimum quantity requirement to be graded.

Quantity

• We generally expect at least 5,000 characters (counted by xtools's authorship attribution) to the assigned article unless you upload media file(s) and/or help contribute to classmate article(s).
• If media are created by you, uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons and used in the article, either 1,000 or 2,000 or 3,000 characters credit will be given, regardless of the number of media uploaded.
  • 1,000 characters credit will be given to sound files(s).
  • 1,000 characters credit will be given to image(s).
  • 2,000 characters credit will be given to video(s).
• If you help classmate(s) to edit their articles or create media files for uses in classmates' articles, up to 1,000 bytes of your contributions may be counted. Your classmate(s) must remain in the Wikipedia assignment program at the end of the term so that the articles can be counted.
• All of the work must be created by you and recorded under your username.
• No outstanding WP:COPVIO issues for both text and media.

The work will be graded based on quality and process criteria:

Quality

Learn from similar articles on Wikipedia (preferably higher quality than the article you are working on).

• Structure
  • Follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry.
  • Follow Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section.
• Content
  • All information are relevant to the article and written in encyclopedic tone. (Understand WP:NOT.)
  • Text are clearly supported by reliable sources. (Follow WP:REF.)
  • Do final clean up and proofreading.
• Formatting & housekeeping
  • Formatting (citation e.g. {{cite web}}}, {{cite journal}} and {{cite book}}, heading styles, bullet/numbered point, font face, table, position/layout/caption of images etc.)
  • Other issues (course tag on talk page of your article, make sure you add categories to your article(s) and media)
  • File names in Wikimedia commons or reference name in the article should be sensible and helpful for other editors.
  • Unnecessary files, pages e.g. redirection are nominated for deletion.
  • To produce desired formatting, learn from source codes of other articles on Wikipedia or ask classmates/other Wikipedians.

Process

• Complete the assignment on time.
• Understand Wikipedia articles and policies by independent reading.
• Take appropriate action on comments given by the community/instructor.
• Provide edit summary for every edit on the article namespace.
• If conflict arises, do not engage in edit war. Use talk page/discussion pages to resolve the issue.
• Help improve classmates' articles.
• Thank other editors/reviewers of your article.

--Taweetham (talk) 05:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 08

For your information, the list below may be useful to you:

• final clean up and proofreading before grading.
• clear outstanding work/issues.
• thank other editors of your article. (Log in, check the article's history and click thank.)
• create your user page. (optional)
• Check list

1. Do you meet the quantitative requirement? See the course page for more information.
2. Are your contributions recorded under your account? See a page history or see the file page on commons to verify.
3. Do you have categories for BOTH your article and media files?
4. Do you have sufficient links to and from your article? Check the links to your article by clicking on "What links here" on the left-hand menu. It is useful to have your article included in some templates, for example, Template:Laboratory_equipment.
5. Do your media files clearly demonstrate the subject matter? Do your files have a sensible name? (You can request a name change at Wikimedia Commons by Clicking on "More" --> "Move".)
6. Do you have appropriate media caption in your article and appropriate description/license information on Wikimedia Commons page?
7. Does your article follow the "Manual of Style" and properly referenced?
8. Check the talk page of your article. See if page issues are addressed.

--Taweetham (talk) 01:46, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

ICCH224 Week 12

Congratulations! You have completed the work and the grade is now available on Canvas. --Taweetham (talk) 08:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Ajarn! Kradangna2001 (talk) 00:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)