Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! Kru666, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Snowycats (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Ritual Network (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Abdullah Alam (talk) 10:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ritual Network (February 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 18:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Ritual Network concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ritual Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Ritual Network concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ritual Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ritual Network

edit
 

Hello, Kru666. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ritual Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 20:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumiko Nakano (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sumiko Nakano has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sumiko Nakano. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumiko Nakano (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Guessitsavis were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 10:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumiko Nakano (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Afyaniuhai was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ANUwrites 18:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumiko Nakano (March 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumiko Nakano (April 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Toadette (Let's talk together!) 11:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply