Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
IVORK Discuss 06:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Krys112! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK Discuss 06:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Seaweed— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Seaweed. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Seaweed was changed by Krys112 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858855 on 2018-06-06T02:10:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Seaweed, you may be blocked from editing. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Spirit College.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Holy Spirit College was changed by Krys112 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911224 on 2018-06-06T02:16:06+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:16, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Krys112/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Krys112/sandbox, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply