Kshatriyaaz

Hello Kshatriyaaz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoikhoi 06:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

hi

On The Argumentative Indian I noticed a change you made here. While Amartya Sen can easily be defined a sympathetic to the left, a proper source needs to be found for all such allegations, otherwise it violates WP:OR.Bakaman 16:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Guidance

Hello, I noticed that some recent edits that you made to The Argumentative Indian were reverted. I just wanted to explain the reason so that you can continue to make contributions to Wikipedia that will improve the aritcles. The reason that these edits were reverted was because you didn't provide a citation to a reliable source that has previously published the information that you wanted to add (see WP:Reliable sources). If this is done, and the information is written in Wikipedia maintaining a neutral point of view, it is likely that it will remain as informative, encyclopedic information. Sancho McCann 18:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Please replay (Talk:Amartya Sen)

Here: Talk:Amartya Sen#Perception of Sen among Many Indians --Y2y 20:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

POV Insertion

Please don't insert uncited personal commentary on wikipedia as you did here and in many other of your edits. Note that, adding criticism is perfectly fine, but it has to be attributed to published and well-regarded sources and cannot simply represent an editor's personal opinions on the topic. I recommend that you review wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view and reliable sources. Abecedare 00:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Jawaharlal Nehru

I see you have had trouble with your edits so far on Wikipedia. WP is not a place to pass on information, even if you know it is true. It is a place to report information that you can provide a citation for. Unless you can provide a citation fot any further edits, and can show that your edits respect WIkipedia policy, particularly WP:OR, and WP:NPOV, you will continue to be reverted near-instantly, and this will be a waste of your time as well as ours. Hornplease 06:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Amartya Sen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CRETOG8(t/c) 04:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)