Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuck Tingle Bibliography (January 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ktemu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chuck Tingle Bibliography. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuck Tingle Bibliography (January 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Talk pages

edit

Hi Ktemu

When you are commenting on article talk pages, like at Talk:Chuck Tingle, it is really helpful if you add your comments to the bottom of the discussion, rather than at the top like you did here – which makes it really hard for other editors to find your comments.

In this particular case, you should probably start a new section entirely, after the boxed rfc, so editors can see at a glance that the discussion has been brought back up after the rfc was resolved. To do so, use the "+New topic" button at the top of the talk page.

Thanks :)

Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 21:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Also, please sign your comment using four tildes (~) like so: ~~~~. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Hi Ktemu! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Chuck Tingle several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Chuck Tingle, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers 02:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

How to Wikipedia Comment

edit

Wikipedia has a few fundamental rules about content, such as Neutral Point Of View, Verifiability, and Notability. But equally important are the rules about conduct – how we work on this project – and I encourage you to become familiar with them if you want to contribute. Assume Good Faith, No Personal Attacks, Consensus, and the No Edit-Warring, for example. Accusing me of a vendetta against queer people is both personally offensive and ridiculously off-base. I love Chuck. I think he's great! But Wikipedia is not here to provide a log of everything he's uploaded to Amazon. Bottom line: If you don't learn a little about the rules, you aren't going to be successful as a contributor. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply