Welcome

edit

Hello, Kueda, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Invertzoo (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kueda, sorry it has taken Wikipedia so long so get around to welcoming you, but you are very welcome all the same! I was happy to see you make a nudibranch article with a nice one of your pictures. Since you care about mollusks, especially gastropods I am also going to add this:

 Wikiproject Gastropods
I've noticed your edits on pages relating to Gastropods; perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Gastropods?
If you would like more information, please visit the project page or the project talk page.


So welcome, naturalist, malacologist and smart person! Best to you, Invertzoo (talk) 21:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reply to the welcome

edit

Well, thanks to you too for your nice reply to me! Sure, don't feel any pressure to contribute to gastropod coverage, but we will very much welcome any of your very fine photos that you might want to add to pre-existing gastropod articles, or any new articles that you might feel like starting on other nudibranchs or whatever else you might fancy... I am also happy to try to answer any question you might have on the subject of mollusks, at any time. Did you check out our new Juliidae article that was a DYK on the mainpage yesterday? Now that is one weird family of gastropods! They are very small creatures and well camouflaged but I hope we can get some free-use images of living ones before too long, they are very cool creatures. Very best wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 20:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Kueda-okenia rosacea.jpg

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kueda-okenia rosacea.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:28, 25 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kueda, problems with my log-in!

edit

Hello Kueda and thanks so much for iNaturalist. Since you are so software savvy, I wanted to ask for your help. I am currently having very severe problems with my log-in on both Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. It started happening suddenly a couple of hours ago today, but the same thing happened six months ago and back then went on for at least 2 weeks before it got better, more or less spontaneously. Here is what is happening:

I am losing my logged-in status, AND MY PASSWORD VALIDITY, numerous times each hour. Every time I open a new window or even just go away from the computer for 20 minutes and then click back in again, the software drops my log-in. Then my current password no longer works to log me back in, so I have to request a temporary password and then create a new password, again and again and again every few minutes.

This is extremely difficult and extremely time-consuming.

The last time this happened I couldn't find anyone on Wikipedia who had any idea what could be causing this or had any idea how to fix it. I am on a Mac with OS X Yosemite, version 10.10.1. I was using Safari, but I just now switched to Firefox to see if that would make a difference, but it didn't.

If you wouldn't mind replying to me via email as well as on my talk page, because using my talk page is very difficult right now.

I very much appreciate any insight you might have or any idea as to who I should call about this,

Best wishes and thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chelifer cancroides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Kueda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Kueda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Euchloe ausonides, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central Valley and Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Icaricia

edit

You changed Icaricia in 2011 to state the genus is invalid and mostly synonymous to Plebejus. However, LepIndex, ButMoth and funet still treat it as valid species—though considering how slow the various databases are at times in updating taxonomy, it doesn't prove all that much. It just means I can't verify either way whether the genus is valid or not—and the source you added with the edit is the original description of the genus and used to reference a different part of the content you added. Do you happen to remember what source you based your edit on, or otherwise have access to a source that verifies the invalidity of the genus? P.S. please ping me or leave a talkback message if you choose to respond here rather than at my talkpage. While I've watchlisted your talkpage, my watchlist is eternally overcrowded and it's possible I might miss a response otherwise. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 22:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately I don't remember, and looking at http://butterfliesofamerica.com/US-Can-Cat.htm I think that the current state of affairs is that Icaricia *is* valid, so either I was wrong at the time I made that change or things have since changed again and it's been re-instated. Granted, that's a North American source, but if it aligns with things like LepIndex, it's probably right. Pelham was also revised last year, so it's probably pretty current. Kueda (talk) 04:54, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your fast response! Re-instatement certainly is a possibility, the past decade or so hasn't exactly been the calmest or most stable in regards to Lepidoptera taxonomy...  As it seems to be currently valid, I intend to change that part of your edit back—unless you see any reason why I shouldn't that I'm overlooking? AddWittyNameHere (talk) 05:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
No objections here, please go for it! Kueda (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Kueda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tharsalea gorgon

edit

Hi Kueda, You recently created a redirect from Tharsalea gorgon to Lycaena gorgon, but it is not mentioned on the target page at all, so it is not clear whether this is an accepted synonym. Please provide some information on the target page referring to the name and author with a reliable reference. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dirona (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Dirona (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply