Jan Suraaj

edit

Jan Suraaj related information should be expanded in that article only, with a gist in Kishor's article, which is already there. Also do not make it an essay or a party manifesto. Articles' should be encyclopedic. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Kusinara! Your additions to Jan Suraaj have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tollens (talk) 03:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi – my attention was brought to the dispute at Mithila (region) via my user talk page. I've left this standard notice as it seems you might be unaware of the three-revert rule described above: please continue trying to reach consensus at the talk page of the article rather than continuing to repeatedly revert. Tollens (talk) 03:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bihari

edit

Bihari ki samajhlu Bihari mahana howe 2409:40E4:1144:1F2B:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 04:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply