Kuya Montano
June 2024
edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 in Philippine television, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 08:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice. Kuya Montano (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Possible unconstructive edit with removing disambiguations
edit Notice that Wil To Win is not official announcement from A2Z website pages. Also, Paano Kita Mapasasalamatan? disambiguation was reverted to article as Paano Kita Mapasasalamatan? (TV series) by DisamAssist. Doing so, any possible unconstructive edit without citing a reliable source will result for a warning or block and reverted immediately. Thank you. Icarus58 (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok noted. Kuya Montano (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Jhoanna (singer), without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AstrooKai │ Talk 08:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, here is my good reason regarding my move from Jhoanna (singer) to Jhoanna. Transitioning from Jhoanna as a singer to Jhoanna in a broader context offers a strategic opportunity for growth and expansion. By broadening her public persona beyond just her musical career, Jhoanna can leverage her established reputation to explore new ventures, such as acting, philanthropy, or even entrepreneurship. This diversification can help her build a more robust personal brand, attract a wider audience, and open up additional revenue streams. Moreover, it allows her to connect with fans on different levels, fostering a more comprehensive and enduring relationship. Kuya Montano (talk) 08:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing your reasoning. However, using just "Jhoanna" for the article's title could lead to ambiguities, especially since there may be other notable individuals with the same name that is yet to be covered here in Wikipedia. According to Wikipedia's naming conventions for personas, disambiguation is important to ensure clarity and accuracy. Since Jhoanna is primarily known as a singer, "Jhoanna (singer)" is an appropriate title that aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines on disambiguating article titles. Her involvement in other fields can certainly be included and expanded upon in the article's content itself, under different sections such as "Other ventures". This approach maintains the integrity of the article while allowing for a broader representation of her career. AstrooKai │ Talk 09:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Instead of Jhoanna (singer), just put Jhoanna Robles to be appropriate. Kuya Montano (talk) 09:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- This can be done, and it is acceptable. But please note that as stated in my initial message, consensus needs to be reached before a page is moved. This is important to ensure that all concerned editors agree on the proposal of moving the page before it is executed, this is to also avoid possible disputes that may arise as a result of the move. AstrooKai │ Talk 09:12, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Instead of Jhoanna (singer), just put Jhoanna Robles to be appropriate. Kuya Montano (talk) 09:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also, could you clarify how changing the title contributes to Jhoanna's ability to "build a more robust personal brand, attract a wider audience, and open additional revenue streams"? While these are important aspects of her career, I'm curious about how the title change directly supports these goals within the context of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. AstrooKai │ Talk 09:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Changing the title of Jhoanna's Wikipedia article can significantly contribute to her ability to build a more robust personal brand, attract a wider audience, and open additional revenue streams by ensuring that the title accurately reflects her most recognized name, current professional identity, or significant achievements. This enhances brand consistency across various platforms, improves search engine optimization (SEO), and increases visibility. A relevant and current title can attract more visitors who are interested in her latest work or status, thereby widening her audience. Moreover, a well-chosen title can enhance her professional perception, potentially leading to new opportunities such as speaking engagements, collaborations, and endorsements, all of which can generate additional revenue. However, instead of "known professionally as Jhoanna", it should be "better by her stage name Jhoanna". Thank you so much. Kuya Montano (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for elaborating on your reasoning. I understand the significance of having a title that aligns with Jhoanna's current professional identity and how it could benefit her brand. However, it's important to remember that Wikipedia functions as an encyclopedia rather than a promotional platform. The primary goal is to provide clear and accurate information to readers.
- The title "Jhoanna (singer)" is in line with Wikipedia's naming conventions, specifically for disambiguating individuals with similar names. This ensures clarity and avoids confusion with other notable figures. While SEO and visibility are important, Wikipedia's titles are primarily guided by the need for disambiguation and neutral, factual representation. AstrooKai │ Talk 09:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Howard the Duck (talk) said that if there are no other notable Jhoannas, this should be primary topic and should not he disambiguated. The question is if she is independently notable given that a great majority of the references are YouTube, from ABS-CBN (failing WP:RS), or primarily talks about Bini or the reality show (failing WP:GNG). Kuya Montano (talk) 01:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Changing the title of Jhoanna's Wikipedia article can significantly contribute to her ability to build a more robust personal brand, attract a wider audience, and open additional revenue streams by ensuring that the title accurately reflects her most recognized name, current professional identity, or significant achievements. This enhances brand consistency across various platforms, improves search engine optimization (SEO), and increases visibility. A relevant and current title can attract more visitors who are interested in her latest work or status, thereby widening her audience. Moreover, a well-chosen title can enhance her professional perception, potentially leading to new opportunities such as speaking engagements, collaborations, and endorsements, all of which can generate additional revenue. However, instead of "known professionally as Jhoanna", it should be "better by her stage name Jhoanna". Thank you so much. Kuya Montano (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing your reasoning. However, using just "Jhoanna" for the article's title could lead to ambiguities, especially since there may be other notable individuals with the same name that is yet to be covered here in Wikipedia. According to Wikipedia's naming conventions for personas, disambiguation is important to ensure clarity and accuracy. Since Jhoanna is primarily known as a singer, "Jhoanna (singer)" is an appropriate title that aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines on disambiguating article titles. Her involvement in other fields can certainly be included and expanded upon in the article's content itself, under different sections such as "Other ventures". This approach maintains the integrity of the article while allowing for a broader representation of her career. AstrooKai │ Talk 09:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
editHello, can you explain why some of the alternate articles have redirect of these programs. However, I suspected that Minute to Win It was transposed into redirect articles as Minute to Win It: Last Man Standing. So, please do not remove some of these primary redirects to avoid confusion of majority changes from the wikilink and provide your evidence to support your reasons. Thank you. Icarus58 (talk) 03:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, alternate articles often redirect to more commonly titled or broader topics for several reasons. First, it helps streamline the content by consolidating information, ensuring that readers are directed to the most comprehensive and authoritative page on the subject. This reduces redundancy and avoids having multiple articles with overlapping content, which can be confusing for users. Additionally, redirects are used when the alternate title is a less common or informal name for the subject, ensuring that users searching with different terminology still reach the relevant information. Redirects also help in maintaining the accuracy of internal links within Wikipedia, ensuring that all references point to the correct and most detailed page. Overall, these redirects are a part of Wikipedia's efforts to maintain a clean, organized, and user-friendly knowledge base. Please understand this reason and thank you very mcuh. Kuya Montano (talk) 03:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- So, have you already read as WP:REDIRECT and WP:CHEAP? I observed some of these programs are primarily redirect prior to the subject in Wikipedia. Icarus58 (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes Icarus58 (talk), I already red the WP:REDIRECT and WP:CHEAP on Wikipedia. WP:REDIRECT is a Wikipedia guideline that covers the creation and management of redirects, which are pages that automatically take users to another page. Redirects are often used when there are multiple names or variations for a subject, helping users find the correct article easily. WP:CHEAP, on the other hand, is a part of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, indicating that Wikipedia is "not paper" and therefore does not have to be "cheap" in terms of space; however, this does not mean that any topic automatically deserves an article. It emphasizes that just because something can be included doesn't mean it should be, particularly if it doesn't meet notability standards. Your observation about programs being primarily redirects suggests that these topics may not have enough standalone notability or content to warrant a full article, and thus are redirected to broader or more relevant topics. Kuya Montano (talk) 03:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Generally, the redirects are emphasize through the main article and without hurt your bandwidth usage. But remember, Kuya Montano, some of the editors and many users may not acceptable when it comes to the multiple links prior to the television programming as the topics. And also, it is not helpful when it comes to remove some specific wikilinks and some of the disambiguation are not specific per WP:DISAM. Thus, 10-Ruby and Aeontamaraw are also used a specific wikilinks and there is no redirect that related to this programs; also, I look some of these primary redirects are no talk page, this should be remove regardless to the disambiguation may used. So, thank you very much to answer this important questions with your general reasoning and if you want to ask some of your questions, feel free to ask at my talk page. Icarus58 (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- And also, be careful the wikilinks should be specified and do not remove the valid/alternate redirects. See WP:LINKDD, WP:MOSLINK and WP:DISAM for more details; thus, your cheaper redirects are already reverted and please don't do something else. Thank you. Icarus58 (talk) 10:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Generally, the redirects are emphasize through the main article and without hurt your bandwidth usage. But remember, Kuya Montano, some of the editors and many users may not acceptable when it comes to the multiple links prior to the television programming as the topics. And also, it is not helpful when it comes to remove some specific wikilinks and some of the disambiguation are not specific per WP:DISAM. Thus, 10-Ruby and Aeontamaraw are also used a specific wikilinks and there is no redirect that related to this programs; also, I look some of these primary redirects are no talk page, this should be remove regardless to the disambiguation may used. So, thank you very much to answer this important questions with your general reasoning and if you want to ask some of your questions, feel free to ask at my talk page. Icarus58 (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes Icarus58 (talk), I already red the WP:REDIRECT and WP:CHEAP on Wikipedia. WP:REDIRECT is a Wikipedia guideline that covers the creation and management of redirects, which are pages that automatically take users to another page. Redirects are often used when there are multiple names or variations for a subject, helping users find the correct article easily. WP:CHEAP, on the other hand, is a part of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, indicating that Wikipedia is "not paper" and therefore does not have to be "cheap" in terms of space; however, this does not mean that any topic automatically deserves an article. It emphasizes that just because something can be included doesn't mean it should be, particularly if it doesn't meet notability standards. Your observation about programs being primarily redirects suggests that these topics may not have enough standalone notability or content to warrant a full article, and thus are redirected to broader or more relevant topics. Kuya Montano (talk) 03:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- So, have you already read as WP:REDIRECT and WP:CHEAP? I observed some of these programs are primarily redirect prior to the subject in Wikipedia. Icarus58 (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 in Philippine television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High definition. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect pipe links as valid redirect titles
edit Hi @Kuya Montano, please do not remove it the pipe links, that is related to the article titles to alternative redirects — as well as standalone article titles, as you did at 2024 in Philippine television, without an instructions for Manual of Style (Linking). Please review the guidelines at disambiguation links & pipe links for more details. Thank you. Icarus58 (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, if you violated the rules at WP:DAB without permitted the unexplained removal links as these mentions above into transposed into valid redirects, you will be blocked from editing. Icarus58 (talk) 23:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Disambiguation link notification for September 1
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited TV Patrol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Saturday.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)