Kvdoglover

Welcome!

Hello, Kvdoglover, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rudi Dollmayer (model), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rudi Dollmayer (model)

The article Rudi Dollmayer (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, only coverage, and even that is very limited, has to do with the sexual abuse charges, so WP:BIO1E would apply. But not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

Hello, thank you for mentioning this but I would like to know ways in which the article can be saved? Would removing all details beyond the Bruce Weber details suit? The article for the model for Marcus Schenkenberg has multiple citations needs throughout and also has an agency mention that has no relevant Wikipedia page, but this passed the regulations. Is it simply because there's more credible source material available? As the other things in the Dollmayer article have photographic proof but no articles (other than the ones labeled) to back it up as what little was available on the internet has either been removed or is now only available in blogs. It would just be a shame to have a page removed simply because the credible sources we have are not enough despite the fact when searched, no one will deny this person exists. Again, if you have any further tips on what can be done, it would be much appreciated.    

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rudi Dollmayer (model) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudi Dollmayer (model) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudi Dollmayer (model) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

My apologies, as I thought in your previous message you stated that I could: "You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page." My apologies, if I somehow misinterpreted this. Also in the article for deletion Wikipedia page it states I can remove this, but does not clarify as to where exactly I suppose. Please state in full detail where I may remove the notice. Thank you.