Kyzagan

Extended-confirmed required

It has come to my attention that you have recently started to edit in articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan, this editing area is under a community imposed extended-confirmed restriction. Your number of edits is below the threshold for editing in the area, thus you cannot currently edit in articles and content related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, please refrain from doing so, any edits you have done since this restriction was implemented should be reverted, I will take the liberty of reverting wherever it's appropriate. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 07:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

How unacceptable is it for you, Kevo327, to have someone stop you from spreading your ideology? I am very sorry for the damage you and your team have done to the Encyclopedia. If you bother to read the change you just reverted, maybe you can see the mistake you made (You are that experienced at Wikipedia, right?). Armenian Highlands and Western Armenia are used synonymously but I am not aware of it? Other than that, I haven't even made any changes to the pages you mentioned. On the contrary, I tried to make the pages better with visual arrangements. But even the writing of "This user is of Turkish ancestry." on my page obviously causes you to be filled with hatred and lose your cool. Scribble them as you want, fill them with racism, hatred, revanchism and irredentism, I don't care anymore. I will not make any further changes to these pages. Kyzagan (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

• Per the above general sanction, you are also not allowed to participate in move discussions, such as the one at 2023 Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh in which you attempted to participate today: non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even within the "Talk:" namespace. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, RMs, and noticeboard discussions. (emphasis mine). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

  I am someone who follows the issue from afar. As far as I can see, the editor named "kevo" adds data to articles from many sources that defend Armenian theses and openly make propaganda. Do you consider any sanctions regarding this situation? A simple example is the Lemkin Institute, an institute founded in 2021 following the Nagorno-Karabakh war and funded by the Armenian plan. With a small Google search, you can find the connections of this institute with Armenia. To what extent are these sources valid for such a critical article? If I open a website and write about genocide without any evidence, will it be included in the article? 31.223.59.158 (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

  https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/lemkin-institute-issues-active-genocide-alert-azerbaijan-in-artsakh

  The site he cited as a source is an Armenian site. To put it plainly, if the opposite of this situation were to originate from Azerbaijan, what would be your decision?

  https://massispost.com/2023/08/lemkin-institute-issues-active-genocide-alert-azerbaijan-in-artsakh/

  https://massispost.com/am/ 31.223.59.158 (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Even though I agree with what is written, the message is not sent to me. I'm tagging @Rosguill here as he is the destination of the message here. If he sees it, he will answer it himself. Kyzagan (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

EC editors in good standing who can provide relevant diffs are welcome to open a case against Kevo at WP:AE. At this time, neither of you meet that criterion; you aren't extended-confirmed, and the above accusations do not include diffs. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

First of all, I did not make the allegations in question, there was no reason for you to involve me. Secondly, it is a very nice behavior to get out of trouble by saying like "sue him if you can" instead of responding properly to a user who asks you something. Anyway, thanks for the answer. Kyzagan (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

If you do not have the intelligence to understand this pro shell institute founded in 2021 with a simple Google search. You should quit being an editor at Wikipedia. 31.223.59.158 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

For some reason, it seems funny to read what is written above, knowing that the user in question has been banned from Wikipedia indefinitely as of December. Looks like I was right about propaganda and racism having no place on Wikipedia, right? haha :) Kyzagan (talk) 20:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)