Your submission at Articles for creation: Kriya Yoga Guru Yogacharya Tapan Bose (November 15)

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kriya Yoga Guru Yogacharya Tapan Bose (January 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kriya Yoga Guru Yogacharya Tapan Bose (March 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! LAKULISH, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

January 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User talk:Ritchie333, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 03:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, please remove block. I was editing as I had more new information based on some added research. I was also following the advice of a Help desk chat person who told me to provide more autobiographical information. I am not a Wikipedia expert. This is my first article. Hence I may make some errors in protocol. The block serves nobody. I think that the article that I am writing is news worthy and has merit. So I will use Sandbox as advised. But the last edit is what I asked to be reviewed. My reviewer has not approved this article since 2013. This is like very bizarre. I provided references as requested. You guys are just making this process way too complex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKULISH (talkcontribs)

The problem is that you were putting your draft articles on my talk page, which is where people want to have conversations with me. I'm sure you didn't intend to vandalise my talk page at all, but the end result is the same - I had to roll back the edits so I could answer other questions there. To be unblocked, you will need to understand where the appropriate place is to put submissions, and what information is required. I note that, contrary to what you said, two other reviewers have declined the submission - most recently in March 2014. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply