LCJUNIOR1220

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Bro What did this man do wrong? 50.29.96.85 (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Are you connected with LCJUNIOR1220 in any way? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Who? LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 06:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

I was asking the IP, 50.29.96.85, if he is connected to you in any way. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

For me they show as blocked LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 06:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

i can't reply to you sometimes it shows the false block reason sometimes and sometimes it just lets me. LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

fr 47.21.153.2 (talk) 00:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Note

When did I spam or advertise?!?!?!? only possible with a bot so I legit was false banned. that guy was right

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LCJUNIOR1220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Falsely Banned This Also Goes Against The First Amendment LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 06:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:FREESPEECH. The First Amendment means that the government cannot punish you for your speech, it does not mean that private entities cannot have rules about what is said on their computers; just as I cannot force my way into your residence and force you to hear my views on a topic, Wikipedia can determine what content is on its computers. You are blocked for advertising, that's what your request should discuss. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You clearly didn't read The First Amendment it says US Citizens have the power of free will such as the freedom of speech, the power to bare arms, the right to a lot of things you never read so yea when I take this to court and win don't be mad :) But if I advertised tell me when/what I advertised. because I never advertised XD your moderation is just trash

No, the First Amendment says nothing of the sort(and the right to bear arms is the Second Amendment); your understanding of the US Constitution needs some work. As I said, free speech means that the government cannot punish you for what you say. It doesn't mean that you cannot have rules about what is said and done in your home- I cannot enter your home against your will and force you to hear my views on a topic. Just the same, Wikipedia can determine what content is on its computers for any reason or even no reason. If you choose to stick to your incorrect view of the US Constitution, you will not be unblocked. You may make a new request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Buddy I'm looking at it right now XD

Also you ignored my question about when did I ever spam or advertise which proves I'm a victim here and I'm falsely banned.

Again, see WP:FREESPEECH. You made several edits promoting Roblox players and their YouTube channels. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Bro what? all I did was make a page on a youtuber LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Block evasion reporting. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 07:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

crazy how you got that ip user false banned XD I told this to my fans on YouTube LOL this proves my point even more that Wikipedia moderation is Hot garbage thanks for proving me more correct! :D LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

just letting ya know if a bunch of ips comment it ain't me LCJUNIOR1220 (talk) 07:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)