LIUC02Nico, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi LIUC02Nico! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cranial drill has been accepted

edit
 
Cranial drill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Craniotome (tool) article

edit

I have reverted this to a complete version of the article. I understand you are writing a replacement article, but removing sourced material to make room for your article before completing that article is not proper. All such changes and redirects can be done after your new article has been accepted. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I see that you had written the article before the redirect. Revert to the proper redirect once your new article is back in mainspace. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Back again. Most of that "sourced" article was a hoax, so I've put it back to a redirect. However looking at your previous article (now in draft), you need to pay attention to the comments Jytdog made while removing sections. He was completely correct about the article. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cranial drill (December 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply