Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, LN Pinedo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ventura Theatre, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have no connection to nobody. I dont understand what I even did. LN Pinedo (talk) 15:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why did you erase all of the work I did? I spent a lot of time doing that & you just erase it? LN Pinedo (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ventura Theatre, you may be blocked from editing. Becase of your WP:COI you must not edit the article directly. Instead, you must propose changes to the article on the article Talk page. In addition, you must declare your COI on your userpage as the notice above states. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I DONT KNOW ANYBODY FROM ANYWHERE! Why are you saying that? And I can add the source I don't care. LN Pinedo (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ventura Theatre. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Ventura Theatre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit War? I have just been adding to the Concert dates as I go. It's nothing to do with any kind of war. I would like to speak to somebody about you because this is ridiculous. I haven't done anything to anyone. LN Pinedo (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
And you could have asked me before assuming I was connected to someone ; to provided sources before erasing all of the work I did. LN Pinedo (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
The point of your edit being reverted before they ask you is that they notify you so you can learn from your mistake and try again. There is no reason to fight against it. Insendieum (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply