Welcome!

edit

Hello, Lachlan Carr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Video game addiction has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stats for most sports in tables (February 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
It's Boothsift 00:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lachlan Carr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! It's Boothsift 00:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stats for most sports in tables (February 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • I’d strongly suggest that you include a lede which then gives readers an idea about what exactly the article is about. That might also provide clarity as to what the correct title that the article should have. As at the moment I not certain why the article is notable and whether it doesn’t exist elsewhere. Dan arndt (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Stats for most sports in tables

edit
 

Hello, Lachlan Carr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stats for most sports in tables".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Lachlan Carr

edit

  User:Lachlan Carr, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lachlan Carr and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Lachlan Carr during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Adelaide Football Club records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Shaw. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Most viewed videos on Youtube (By Year) IS WRONG

edit

Hello, my name is Rob17p, I was interested in how you organize the page "the most viewed videos on youtube" so strict that anyone cannot edit it. I make this note to inform you that its content in the table "By year of release" has many errors. As a user who can edit the page, I invite you to look for "Videos más vistos en YouTube por año in Spanish and there you will realize how much they lack.

I HOPE you will check it out to make all the changes

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 New Zealand Warriors season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mackay and Redcliffe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

2023 Gold Coast Titans season moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 2023 Gold Coast Titans season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2023 Wests Tigers season for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Wests Tigers season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Wests Tigers season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 11:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2023 St. George Illawarra Dragons season for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 St. George Illawarra Dragons season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 St. George Illawarra Dragons season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 13:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply