Lainx

Lainx, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lainx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Wiji Arulampalam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wiji Arulampalam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiji Arulampalam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lise Vesterlund

Hello, Lainx,

Thank you for creating Lise Vesterlund.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please try to fix the issue mentioned in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 05:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your feedback and all your explanation regrading signing and everything, that was very kind. I have removed words that were not neutral (such as leading economist --> economist) and added more sources. There are now 16 different sources including the New York Times, the Washington Post and CNBC. I have also added some more content. If I don't hear from you, I will simply remove the neutrality tag but please let me know if it is not ok. @Path slopu:. Lainx (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Anat Admati moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anat Admati, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your feedback which is very helpful as I am new here :) I have re-written the article substantially and removed subjective wording when I saw it (for example leading economist --> economist). I have re-read the article and I think that now each sentence simply states a fact with a source at the end. I have added sources to Bloomberg, NPR, Forbes, The New York Times, The Financial Times, The Guardian, Time Magazine, CNN, The Independent, CNBC, The Economist, The Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. Also, I have never met the person and am not in anyway related. The person is one of the few "Most influential people" listed by Time magazine to not have a wikipedia entry so I think it would make sense for them to have one. KartikeyaS, do you think you could have a look and if you have time review the page again? Lainx (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anat Admati has been accepted

Anat Admati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Categories

Hi Lainx, and thanks for contributing so many high-quality new articles! As a tip, to help your articles be noticed, consider adding them to categories. Wikiacc (¶) 19:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey Wikiacc, thanks a lot for the tip, I was a bit shy with categories but I'm about to publish a new article and will add categories thanks for letting me know!Lainx (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hi I’m just reviewing Barbara Sianesi and wanted to thank you for creating such an informative article. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lainx

Thank you for creating Olympia Bover.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you link somewhere to Google Scholar, in the normal way. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 21:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Valérie Mignon

Hello, Lainx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valérie Mignon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Valérie Mignon

Hello, Lainx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Valérie Mignon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)