Lampshade Dog
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/New-Bouncywikilogo.gif/50px-New-Bouncywikilogo.gif)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
77/77th Brigade
editI already created a page called Security Assistance Group with all the proper references. Creating a new 77th Brigade page is confusing. Merge into my page please.Phd8511 (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- No - SAG is now 77 Bde Lampshade Dog (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Ordinal numbering
editI noticed that you are moving pages and editing them to remove the ordinal numbering, using the reasoning "correct name". Please elaborate and point me to your source for this. Thanks. Keri (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Move
editCan't be bothered to reply? Also, your copy/paste removed the article history. Keri (talk) 21:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
editHi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 40th Regiment Royal Artillery a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Keri (talk) 09:21, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Moving pages
editHi - Thanks for your recent edits on regiments. Please note that the procedure for requesting the move of an article is set out at WP:RM. In particular please avoid "cut & paste" as the article history gets lost. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 10:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Regimental Police and stop just reverting. The common name is Regimental Police, which also appears to be the official name in other countries. The official British name already appears within the article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Special Air Service, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 4 August
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the No. 644 Squadron RAF page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
It's well over twenty years since I served in the OTC and I don't know what the set-up is like now, but deleting information just because it isn't current is not particularly helpful. If the situation with different corps sections and NRPS has changed then by all means record the new system, but please retain the old information as historical information. Wikipedia does not just record the present, but also the past. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Lampshade Dog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Lampshade Dog. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article List of Territorial Army units (2012) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Why do we need a list of units from the Territorial Army as of 2012? The TA was renamed as the Army Reserve around 2011. This list fails WP:NNC or WP:GNG. Show why this is article is needed. If not I really feel it need as WP:PROD. [[User:BlueD954
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlueD954 (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)