Lankman

A tag has been placed on Stealing Fortunes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Stealing Fortunes is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Stealing Fortunes. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. -- Oldelpaso 17:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Polyester

That, of course, was wrong.

If you'd like to correct the chemistry or aesthetics information in the article, you might consider replacing information you think is incorrect with the truth, as you know it to be. Adding "this is wrong" to the ends of sentences is unlikely to be viewed as constructive.

Please let me know if you have real objections to the article's content and want help in making lasting changes, I'd be happy to help.

--Joel 18:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Gay. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. lwalt 20:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Josh flowerday, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wildthing61476 14:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Attacks in the article Phil wade

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Phil wade. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Rossheth | Talk to me 14:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of 100 crew

A tag has been placed on 100 crew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ~Matticus ^T_C 14:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalizing in User:Matticus78 /2/

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Matticus78. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. soum ^talk 14:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Matticus78, you will be blocked from editing. Samtheboy ^(t/c) 14:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Unblocked

You are unblocked for now. Remember, you are being watched. :P Welcome back. --soum ^talk 15:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)