October 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm That Coptic Guy. I noticed that you recently removed content from Carlos Moreno (scientist) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. For large removals such as this one, please seek talk page consensus and foster discussion. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

As explained, the removed paragraphs are self promotion and have no encyclopedic value. Laritoune (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Laritoune - You need to gain consensus from the community and those involved with the article through discussion on the the article's talk page, in accordance with WP:TALKDONTREVERT. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Then don't revert my cancellations. And try to convince me of the scientific value of the deleted paragraphs. Laritoune (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Laritoune - I would be happy to talk things through on the talk page, as me and @Thegreatluigi have already told you several times. Stop removing large swathes of text without consensus. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carlos Moreno (scientist), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. See reply above. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply