Welcome

edit
Hello, Lassebeg, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Lassebeg, good luck, and have fun.C.Fred (talk) 22:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello C.fred Thx Lassebeg (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wuhan

edit

Hello Lassebeg! I noticed that you were frustrated that your edits have been reverted, but Wikipedia is not used as a current events buletin page. Information about a current event needs to go in a corresponding section, most likely under the "history" section which the information already is in. Jāzeps (talk) 13:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wuhan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Knock it out with edit summaries such as this CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 23:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Attacking?, do you mean adding content on pages? Lassebeg (talk) 23:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
No, they mean alleging that other editors are Chinese operatives. —C.Fred (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at China. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

You have already been informed why it is inappropriate to add a health warning to this article, the article on Wuhan, or any other similar article. Do not do it again.C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was only wondering the agenda Lassebeg (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lassebeg reported by User:CaradhrasAiguo (Result: ). Thank you. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 23:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. Censorship is a very serious matter. Lassebeg (talk) 23:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
So is violation of Wikipedia policies. —C.Fred (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply