Laurendevera

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Andy Dingley (talk) 23:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Laurendevera, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Laurendevera! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Permission

I saw your note at Andy Dingley's. Please note that while you may have permission to post extensive quotes from Tektronics docs, that's short of the kind of permission that WP needs to republish their material. You'll need to get them to publish or contribute material under an appropriately broad license such as CC-BY-SA 4.0, or just quote small bits of it. And since you work for them, see WP:COI about disclosing that and being careful what you post. Dicklyon (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright

Thanks for your contributions thus far, but they're not (as yet) usable here.

The problem is that WP is intended as "a free encyclopedia". This requires a strong policy on copyright. WP's content is licensed (to readers and those wanting to use it) under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licence. This means that not only is WP "a web encyclopedia" but it's also a reusable web encyclopedia. Other consumers of this content can take the content here and re-use it, even commercially. It's quite a generous free licence.

This imposes constraints on WP. It means that all WP's content has to be obtained (found or created) under a licence which is at least as free, so that we can do this with it. We can't take copyright-protected content that doesn't have a similar licence, because it would stop us freely re-publishing it like this. See Wikipedia:Copyrights for more detail.

As to the Tektronix content, then it seems to be (as is usual) Tektronix' protected content and not licensed as we'd need: https://www.tek.com/page/terms-use That means that we can use it as reference material (Obviously Tek meets our WP:RS policy) and even the WP:EL policy (this is rather different). But we can't just paste in chunks to here - it would stop us then freely re-licensing that page to others. Yes, we could build an encyclopedia that way; but we couldn't build a free encyclopedia that way.

I hope this makes it a bit clearer, or just ask. Thanks for your contributions and I'm sure that there's plenty here you'd be able to help with. But it's not quite this simple. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, this is helpful! Should I then paraphrase and then cite at the end of the paragraph? Or after each sentence? I worry it'll be distracting and hard to read if it's the latter. By the looks of other Wiki pages, people do not cite after each sentence. Thanks again!

Your thread has been archived

Hi Laurendevera! You created a thread called Citing/Copywrite Question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but these are a long way from unwanted spam and it is very WP:BITEY to describe them as such. Tektronix is about as robust a WP:RS as we could get for these and WP could benefit a great deal from this content. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Spamming is a behavior, and when this account (and related accounts such as User:DataAndDonuts) are repetitively linking the same manufacturer on every article they can think of, that is spamming. - MrOllie (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Apparently this is an admitted employee of Tektronix, so they're in violation of WP:PAID and Wikipedia's terms of use as well. - MrOllie (talk) 16:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)