User talk:Laurinavicius/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Wikipedia Day NYC
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 9th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Sunday January 24, 2010 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter
The January 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi to you too!
Thank you for welcoming me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Active Banana (talk • contribs) 19:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're very welcome mate! If you have any questions, I'll be glad to answer them and give you a hand! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Participation at my RfA
Thank you for taking the time to weigh in on my RfA. It was successful, in that the community's wish not to grant me the tools at this time was honored. I'm taking all the comments as constructive feedback and hope to become more valuable to the project as a result; I've also discovered several new areas in which to work. Because debating the merits of a candidate can be taxing on the heart and brain, I offer this kitten as a low-allergen, low-stress token of my appreciation. --otherlleft 12:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
Klis Fortress - GA
Hi Laurinavicius! Klis Fortress is is currently a good article nominee. Additional help and comments are welcome. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 14:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, mate! I'm sorry for the late response; I haven't had much time recently to edit due to finals at school, but I'll definitely be a lot more active in the future and will helps imporve this article to GA-class. Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 22:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Of course...priority must be given to school. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Kieven Rus
Hi
I have had three edit conflicts with you lol. Can you drop me a line on my talk page when you have finished with the article so we can avoid them :¬) Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, sorry :) I'll stop for now and just pick up later, once you're done. Sounds good? Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- No m8, carry on the good work (we did a couple that were the same and I see you are coordinating an interesting project) as I was only there to correct some of the things the previous editor did
- I have started to watch the second half of Apocalypse Now Redux so not free for an hour or so...
- Thanks for the letting me know part though ! Chaosdruid (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're very welcome mate! Laurinavicius (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Khazars and Rus
Thanks for sending me email about Kievan Rus. I am just starting the wiki editing and still learning. However, since I was born in Ukraine and live there fo many years, I know some about the history of this country. The Kiev has never been part Khazaria, but slavic population of Kiev paid money to Khazars in early 9th century before varangians arrive. The main source about russian history of that time is the The Russian Primary Chronicle (http://web.ku.edu/~russcult/culture/handouts/chronicle_all.html) and the Chronicle says:
http://web.ku.edu/~russcult/culture/handouts/chronicle_all.html
6367 (859) The Varangians from beyond the sea imposed tribute upon the Chuds, the Slavs, the Merians, the Ves, and the Krivichians. But the Khazars imposed it upon the Polianians, the Severians, and the Viatichians, and collected a squirrel skin and a beaver skin from each hearth.
With Rurik there were two men who did not belong to his kin, but were boyars. They obtained permission to go to Constantinople with their families. They thus sailed down the Dnieper, and in the course of their journey they saw a small city on a hill. Upon their inquiry as to whose town it was, they were informed that three brothers, Kii, Shchek, and Khoriv, had once built the city, but that since their deaths, their descendants were living there as tributaries of the Khazars. Askold and Dir remained in this city, and after gathering together many Varangians, they established their domination over the country of the Polianians at the same time that Rurik was ruling at Novgorod
In fact Khazars and Rus was a bitter enemies all the time long until Rus king Svatoslav (grandson of varangian Rurik) totaly distroed the capital of Khazaria Itil.
Sviatoslav I of Kiev finally succeeded in destroying Khazar imperial power in the 960s. The Khazar fortresses of Sarkel and Tamatarkha fell to the Rus in 965, with the capital city of Atil following circa 968 or 969. A visitor to Atil wrote soon after the sacking of the city: "The Rus attacked, and no grape or raisin remained, not a leaf on a branch."
Most of russians would be really surprized (if not upset) when you tell them that Khazaria is predesessor of Kievan Rus. This does not make any sence since these many historical and poetical books about wars between khazars and early russians (see the main article about Khazars and Rise of Rus).
The Rus warlords Oleg and Sviatoslav I of Kiev launched several wars against the Khazar khaganate, often with Byzantine connivance.
Pushkin for example wrote a great poem about Rus second king Oleg war with Khazars. The Khazars (see main article) were a semi-nomadic Turkic people who was eventualy distroed by slavic Rus and other neigbors. Innab (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! Well, first off, I didn't send you any e-mail (maybe that was some other user as I don't know your e-mail address), particularly one regarding Kievan Rus'. However, I did leave a message on your talk page, but that was simply a welcome message. Second, I responded to your above comment (as you left the same comment on this page, your talk page, and the Kievan Rus' talk page) at the Kievan Rus' talk page, but I'll also post it here just in case. I stated: Khazaria certainly was a predecessor of Kievan Rus'. In 882, Prince Oleg of Novgorod revolted against Khazaria and formally established the state known today as Kievan Rus'. Prior to Oleg's revolt, the territory of the future Kievan state was ruled over by the Khazars and the Varangians, but primarily the former. The people of this territory were forced to pay taxes and tribute to the Khazars. Thus, Khazaria was a predecessor of Rus' as: a) the territory that later came to make up Kievan Rus' was ruled by Khazaria; and b) Prince Oleg of Novogorod formally established Kievan Rus' by revolting and declaring independence from Khazaria. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Innab (talk) 04:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well, according to Russian Primary Chronicle Oleg was Oleg was varangian and a relative of the first ruler, Rurik, and was entrusted by Rurik to take care of both his kingdom and his young son Ingvar, or Igor. Oleg gradually took control of the Dnieper cities, captured Kiev (previously held by the Varangian warlords, Askold and Dir) and finally moved his capital from Novgorod there.
The Rus' Primary Chronicle: [1]
6367 (859). The Varangians from beyond the sea imposed tribute upon the Chuds, the Slavs, the Merians, the Ves', and the Krivichians. But the Khazars imposed it upon the Polyanians, the Severians, and the Vyatichians, and collected a white squirrel-skin from each hearth.
6368–6370 (860–862). The tributaries of the Varangians drove them back beyond the sea and, refusing them further tribute, set out to govern themselves. There was no law among them, but tribe rose against tribe. Discord thus ensued among them, and they began to war one against another. They said to themselves, “Let us seek a prince who may rule over us and judge us according to the Law.” They accordingly went overseas to the Varangian Rus': these particular Varangians were known as Rus', just as some are called Swedes, and others Normans, English, and Gotlanders, for they were thus named. The Chuds, the Slavs, the Krivichians, and the Ves' then said to the people of Rus', “Our land is great and rich, but there is no order in it. Come to rule and reign over us.” They thus selected three brothers, with their kinsfolk, who took with them all the Rus' and migrated. The oldest, Rurik, located himself in Novgorod; the second, Sineus, at Beloozero; and the third, Truvor, in Izborsk. On account of these Varangians, the district of Novgorod became known as the land of Rus'. The present inhabitants of Novgorod are descended from the Varangian race, but aforetime they were Slavs.
...
With Rurik there were two men who did not belong to his kin, but were boyars. They obtained permission to go to Tsargrad with their families. They thus sailed down the Dnipro, and in the course of their journey they saw a small city on a hill. Upon their inquiry as to whose town it was, they were informed that three brothers, Kyi, Shchek, and Khoriv, had once built the city, but that since their deaths, their descendants were living there as tributaries of the Khazars. Askold and Dir remained in the city, and after gathering together many Varangians, they established their dominion over the country of the Polyanians at the same time that Rurik was ruling at Novgorod. ...
6378–6387 (870–879). On his deathbed, Rurik bequeathed his realm to Oleg, who belonged to his kin, and entrusted to Oleg’s hands his son Igor', for he was very young.
6388–6390 (880–882). Oleg set forth, taking with him many warriors from among the Varangians, the Chuds, the Slavs, the Merians and all the Krivichians. He then came to the hills of Kyiv, and saw how Askold and Dir reigned there. He hid his warriors in the boats, left some others behind, and went forward himself bearing the child Igor'. He thus came to the foot of the Hungarian hill, and after concealing his troops, he sent messengers to Askold and Dir, representing himself as a stranger on his way to Greece on an errand for Oleg and for Igor', the prince’s son, and requesting that they should come forth to greet them as members of their race. Askold and Dir straightway came forth. Then all the soldiery jumped out of the boats, and Oleg said to Askold and Dir, “You are not princes nor even of princely stock, but I am of princely birth.” Igor' was then brought forward, and Oleg announced that he was the son of Rurik. They killed Askold and Dir, and after carrying them to the hill, they buried them there, on the hill now known as Hungarian, where the castle of Ol'ma now stands. Over that tomb Ol'ma built a church dedicated to St. Nicholas, but Dir’s tomb is behind St. Irene’s. Oleg set himself up as prince in Kyiv, and declared that it should be the mother of Rus' cities. The Varangians, Slavs, and others who accompanied him, were called Rus'. Oleg began to build stockaded towns, and imposed tribute on the Slavs, the Krivichians, and the Merians.
So there is no way Oleg would "declare undependence from Khazars" since he was a Novgorod leader of Varangians and was never under control of Khazars.
- First off, after gaining and securing power in Novgorod, Oleg traveled south to Kiev in 882, which, at the time, was controlled by Khazaria. There, he declared the city's independence from Khazarian rule and its unification with Novogorod, and moved his kingdom's capital from Novgorod to Kiev. This is generally recognized as the formal establishment of Kievan Rus', not when Rurik or Oleg took power in Novgorod years before. Second, Kiev was not a Varangian city during the mid-to-late 800's, but was a Khazarian one. Kiev was conquered by Khazaria in circa 840; prior to that, it was controlled by numerous East Slavic tribes at different periods of time, including the Varangians. However, the Varangians had not controlled Kiev for at least forty-to-fifty years prior to Oleg's capture of the city. Third, while the Russian Primary Chronicle is a well-respected primary source, it has been criticized as being biased towards a sort-of pro-Russian viewpoint, and generally conflicts with other chronicles of the time that discuss these events, such as the Novgorod, Kiev, East Slavic, and Byzantine Chronicles, which, on the other hand, usually agree with one another. So, I disagree with your assertion that the Russian Primary Chronicle is "the main source about russian history of that time", and believe that there are numerous other credible primary sources from that time. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Innab (talk) 07:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC) Ok, I will agree to call Khazaria a "predecessor" in term of control of some territory that later came to make up Kievan Rus', but paying mandatory "tribute" did not mean that Kiev belonged to Khazaria as a full-right member city, it rather was wage of defeat. Chronicle said that "The Varangians, Slavs, and others who accompanied him, were called Rus". Khazarians was forced to withdraw from Kiev, and later been destroyed by Rus and other neigbours.
How's life?
I think the caption speaks for itsself. :D -- Jack1755 (talk) 18:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Lol it does. I'm doing good, you? Laurinavicius (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your RfA Participation
Laurinavicius/Archive 3 - Thanks for your participation in my recent successful RfA. Although you reluctantly did not express confidence or trust in me, the community did and as you are an equal part of that community, deFacto your confidence and trust in me is much appreciated. As a new admin I will try hard to keep from wading in too deep over the tops of my waders, nor shall I let the Buffalo intimidate me.--Mike Cline (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
{{helpme}}
I writed the page “IPoDWDM” in User:Pugliavi/Chris Agee mode, this is the first time that I write. I don’t see my page if in the search. Please can you help me to understand if I wrong the content of my page or I use a wrong procedure? Please can you talk me how can I improve my page?
Thank you Virgilio Puglia 00:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, just a note that if you are asking a specific editor, don't worry about using this template (it's for your own talk page). Also, the page may have been deleted, or the search has not yet indexed it--it takes a while usually. fetchcomms☛ 00:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, but if it's in your userpage, it is not yet an article, you have to move the page first (if your account has 10 edits and is 4 days old, there will be a "move" button at the page's top). fetchcomms☛ 00:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! As Fetchcomms already explained, the page you created is a user page, meaning that it is not an article yet. However, you can make it an article by moving the page into the article space, which you can do by clicking the "Move" button at the top of the page (which appears only after you have made 10 edits and been on Wikipedia for 4 days). Then, on the next page that comes up, type the title "IPoDWDM" (as that will be the article's name) into the box labeled "To new title", and type "Moving the page from the user space into the article space." into the box labeled "Reason" (as that's the reason why you're moving the page). Then, click the button labeled "Move Page" and WALLAH! The page is now an article! If you need any more help with this or anything related to Wikipedia, just let me know and I'll be glad to lend you a hand! Happy editing! :) Laurinavicius (talk) 01:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! (Actually, I was stalking the template, but now I'm stalking your talk page too!) fetchcomms☛ 01:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! As Fetchcomms already explained, the page you created is a user page, meaning that it is not an article yet. However, you can make it an article by moving the page into the article space, which you can do by clicking the "Move" button at the top of the page (which appears only after you have made 10 edits and been on Wikipedia for 4 days). Then, on the next page that comes up, type the title "IPoDWDM" (as that will be the article's name) into the box labeled "To new title", and type "Moving the page from the user space into the article space." into the box labeled "Reason" (as that's the reason why you're moving the page). Then, click the button labeled "Move Page" and WALLAH! The page is now an article! If you need any more help with this or anything related to Wikipedia, just let me know and I'll be glad to lend you a hand! Happy editing! :) Laurinavicius (talk) 01:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, but if it's in your userpage, it is not yet an article, you have to move the page first (if your account has 10 edits and is 4 days old, there will be a "move" button at the page's top). fetchcomms☛ 00:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter
The February 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
greetings returned
Thank you for the greeting. I appreciate the tips. Perhaps I will call upon you for aid in the near future. best, Gamonetus Gamonetus (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're very much welcome, mate! If you have any questions, just drop me a line and I'll be glad to lend you a hand! Happy editing! :) Laurinavicius (talk) 18:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Got a minute for copyediting?
Hey Laurinavicius, I noticed your name on the copyeditor list. I wonder if I could beg a readover for Manitoba? I'm hoping to hit FAC within the next few weeks, but I've been editing mostly on my own for the last little while, so the article would greatly benefit from a fresh set of eyes. Let me know if there's anything I can do in return, and if you don't have the time right now, don't worry about it. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd love to! I was actually just looking for a new project to work on, so you got me at the perfect time :) I'll start working on the article right away. Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 18:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just checking in - are you done with most of what you wanted to do here? Is the article about ready for nomination? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm nearly done with going through it. The article's in very good shape in my opinion, so I think that you should nominate it for FA as soon as you feel that it's ready for nomination. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 19:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just checking in - are you done with most of what you wanted to do here? Is the article about ready for nomination? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Manitoba will (hopefully) be appearing as Today's featured article on May 12 - keeping my fingers crossed on that one. Thanks very much for your help! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome, and I'll keep my fingers crossed too! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Give Me A Chance
Could you give me a chance to explain my position on merging the list of wars debate? B-Machine (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter
The March 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
GA Review for Klis Fortress
Hi Laurinavicius! Klis Fortress is currently on hold to become a good article. Please H E L P !!! Regards, Kebeta (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, mate! I'll get to work on the article as soon as possible, which will definitely be later today, approximately 11 or 12 hours from now, or so. I'll work on improving the article's prose as, according to the reviewer, that needs the most work. Make sure you replace the three references with problems (one is a dead link, the other two are unreliable sources) with more credible and reliable ones. Here we go again! Laurinavicius (talk) 03:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- You are most welcome, because without good copyedit, the article will not pass GA Review! I will replace references and fix some minor details. For next couple days I will be away, so the article is all yours. Thanks! Kebeta (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good, mate! Laurinavicius (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- You are most welcome, because without good copyedit, the article will not pass GA Review! I will replace references and fix some minor details. For next couple days I will be away, so the article is all yours. Thanks! Kebeta (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Zagreb Synagogue
Glad you're interested in the article... So far, Kebeta and Timbouctou are have expressed interest in going for GA too. GregorB (talk) 22:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Great! It looks like we have a good team of collaborators on this project, so let's get cracking! Laurinavicius (talk) 22:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, no time like the present... I'm going to create a rough todo list in the article's talk page. GregorB (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good! Laurinavicius (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, no time like the present... I'm going to create a rough todo list in the article's talk page. GregorB (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Tag&Assess
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I see you that have adopted a range in WP:FILMS' Tag&Asses drive after completing two others. At your convienence, would you be able to finish this range before the end of the month? We want to make sure that all of our start-class articles are reassessed, and if you are facing time constraints or have other projects, feel free to unadopt it if you'd like another editor to take over. Thank you for your contributions so far, I appreciate you helping us to get a better picture of our project's progress. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! Thanks for the reminder about the range; I just really haven't had the time recently to work on it. However, I will put more of my energies into working on the Tag and Assessment project and will begin straight away! Thanks again and happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks for continuing to help out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome, mate. Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 23:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks for continuing to help out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion discussion: Comparison between roman and han empires
Hello. You are invited to take part in the deletion discussion on the redirect Comparison between roman and han empires. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! Thanks for letting me know! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 16:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Assistance Needed
Hi - I found you on "Adopt A User", and need a little help. I'm writing a bio of a living person, Emmy Award Winner for Comedy Writing, Carol Burnett Show 1973, + 4 nominations, and various other noteworthy achievements. I have 17 bibliographic sources, and am down to footnoting which has me puzzled. Plus one or two other things to sort out. Would you be able to help?
I'm new here, and still don't know my way around, so if you could answer me on my talk page, it would be good. Thank you. Ahalani (talk) 20:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! I'd be glad to give you a hand! What exactly are you having difficulty with? Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
BLP Television Writer
Thank you for responding so quickly. Here's the story:
I access the Wiki guide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes#nbFoot01b. One Kind of Footnoting Sample: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.[Ref 1] Amazingly few discotheques provide jukeboxes.[Ref 2] How razorback-jumping frogs can level six piqued gymnasts.[Ref 3] 1. ^ This is the lazy dog reference. 2. ^ This is the jukeboxes reference. 3. ^ This is the jumping frogs reference. I’m confused, because I’m used to footnoting college and research papers, MLA style. Which Wikiway do you find the easiest? And can you please explain it as though for a third grader?! Including notating them as you write the article. Because after this article, I plan others. Also, the subject of the article does not seem to have his birth date documented in any secondary or tertiary source. He gave it to me personally. What do I do? And – he co-produced and wrote the script for a Kennedy Center production, but the only documentation I have is the program which lists his credits. I plan to include an image of it that can be read. He does have a blog that tells his life story without his birthday, including his Emmy work & the Kennedy Center even among others. http://billangelos.typepad.com/my_weblog/ And he has documentaries on YouTube.
I have completed a short summary (about 6 short paragraphs) + Bibliography - 17 entries - that I could send you, but I didn't know if that's appropriate on a Talk Page. The footnoting is the last thing before I request review.
So please guide me, and thank you. Ahalani (talk) 23:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Footnoting on Wikipedia is actually relatively simple. After a sentence or a phrase that you wish to have cited, place the template <ref> ... </ref>, with the bibliographic information where the ellipsis is. To have the reference be shown within the article, create a "References" or "Footnotes" sectionat towards the bottom of the page after all of the text with the template <reflist> in it, and the references will be listed automatically. That's it! If you have any problems or any questions, feel free to let me know and I'll be glad to give you a hand. Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
For excellent copyediting on Klis Fortress, Walls of Dubrovnik and Zagreb Synagogue, among others. Congratulations, Kebeta (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much, mate! I am honored to receive this Barnstar! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 19:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- You are most welcome, for your copyediting and for showing me couple things also. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Your GA nomination of Zagreb Synagogue
The article Zagreb Synagogue you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Zagreb Synagogue for things which need to be addressed. S Masters (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! Thanks for letting me know. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 18:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Zagreb Synagogue
The article Zagreb Synagogue you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zagreb Synagogue for eventual comments about the article. Well done! S Masters (talk) 07:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations!
Congratulations Laurinavicius, great work! Regards, Kebeta (talk) 09:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks on your help, it really made the difference! Cheers, GregorB (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks mates! Congratulations to you too! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 21:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
My Secret Page
Nice job. :)
The Secret Subpage Finder Barnstar | ||
This user has found Hi878's secret hidden sub page! Will you be the next one to find it? Try it here! |
David Bohm bio
Hi -
In the Bridging Science, Philosophy and Cognition section, it reads thusly, and this is the full extent of the section:
In 1959, his wife Saral recommended to him a book she had seen in the library by the speaker on life subjects, Jiddu Krishnamurti. Bohm found himself impressed by the way his own ideas on quantum mechanics meshed with the seemingly-philosophical ideas of Krishnamurti. Bohm's approach to philosophy and physics receive expression in his 1980 book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, and in his 1987 book Science, Order and Creativity. Bohm and Krishnamurti went on to become close friends for over 25 years, with a deep mutual interest in philosophical subjects and the state of humanity.
This whole paragraph is a copy of the blurb describing these products for sale at the Krishnamurti bookstore, their website. If you want to check it out, you have to type in the title of one of these products. The full url below doesn't pull it up.
Can Insight be Awakened in Another? Can Insight Bring About a Mutation of the Brain Cells? 78 mins. - Ending of Time - Talk 4 - Breaking the Pattern of Ego-Centered Activity
Fifteen talks between Krishnamurti and David Bohm. Bohm's scientific and philosophical views seemed inseparable. In 1959, his wife Saral recommended to him a book she had seen in the library by the world-renowned speaker on life subjects, Jiddu Krishnamurti. Bohm found himself impressed by the way his own ideas on quantum mechanics meshed with the ... https://bookstore.kfa.org/cat/catalog/demand-download-c-75.html?osCsid=754d84bcb357e4a7ba8e3edba2a6d5b8
Isn't this against Wiki policy? Plus, no source is cited. Not only that, but the information is very incomplete, and misleading. I'm writing a replacement. But meanwhile, is there some kind of label or other action that can be taken to alert readers?
Thanks Ahalani (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- You're exactly right: that's pretty blatant copyright violation, plagiarism, POV, and promotion of that product. The best thing to do is to immediatly remove that section from the article until you've finished writing the replacement then put the replacement back into the article. Nice work spotting that! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
how to delete
Thanks for feedback. I tried to delete, but I don't think it worked. How do I do this? Ahalani (talk) 11:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's quite simple, actually. First, click the edit button found at the top of the page or near a section heading. Then, highlight the text you wish to delete. Next, press the "Backspace" key. Lastly, click save. Easy, right? Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
2008 South Ossetia War title
I would like to know your opinion concerning a proposal I made, which I think represents a decent compromise.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 03:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I'll posting my views on your proposal soon. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not meaning to pester you, but I was wondering if you were still planning to respond.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's quite alright :) . I'm still weighing the arguments for and against your proposed compromise title, but I will comment sometime today. My regards, Laurinavicius (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not meaning to pester you, but I was wondering if you were still planning to respond.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
WP:FILM Silver Reel | ||
This is to acknowledge and thank you for your participation in tagging and assessing 400 articles in WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive 2009-2010. You have helped to ensure our project has a better idea of the articles under our scope. I appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC) |
WP:FILMS April Newsletter
The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for the welcome. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- You're very welcome, mate! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 01:57, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Don't forget to mark your entries from the Requests page
On behalf of the coordinator of the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors Backlog elimination drive for May 2010, ɳorɑfʈ Talk!, I would like to thank you for your active participation in the Drive.
I am writing to inform you that we have introduced additional Guild of Copy Editors' Gold Star Awards for the drive. To qualify, you will need to add an asterisk to all the full copyedits you have completed from the Requests page. More information can be found in the awards section of the Drive. If you have any questions, please post them to the Drive's talk page. Once again, thank you for participating, and we look forward to a meaningful drop in the numbers due to your hard work and efforts. |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, Laurinavicius! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Substing Welcome Templates
Just a quick note, can you make sure you subst welcome templates when you add them to a users talk page? Thanks =] ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 18:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Unauthorized Individuals Writing My Peter Godwin Page And Reverting My Page When I Seek To Edit It
Hi,
I am Peter Godwin. People keep reverting my edits on my page. Here is what I wrote on the page as a warning- which they ignored. It explains the problem. I need to have control over strangers writing fiction about my life and career (they originally had me born in Germany- I was born in London and have never even lived in Germany- one example of many.) Please read this and direct me with an email contact or a phone number to someone in the Wiki legal department. We need to speak and resolve this. "WITHOUT PREJUDICE- I am Peter Godwin the singer to whom this page refers. I have verified everything here and will continue to edit this page until it is comprehensive and 100% accurate. The previous version was written by someone who does not know me and has never met me. Many of the facts and opinions expressed by that individual were factually incorrect and potentially libelous. They certainly had no verification from me, the subject of this page, nor from any authorized representative of me. If "Akerans" keeps reverting this page to the previous version, I will be obliged to pass this matter over to my lawyers. If any responsible agent of Wikipedia wishes to get in touch with me for verification of my identity, please email me through http://www.nuevomusic.com. I am very happy to be part of Wikipedia, but I cannot tolerate random strangers re-writing my life and career to their misinformed fantasy. I await your response. Peter Godwin 23rd May 2010" Peter Godwin Nuevo (talk) 00:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Re: message to 64.180.111.41
Hi Laurinavicius,
Thanks for the message with Wikipedia info links. I actually have an account, but I have a bad habit of failing to log in before I do any work on my one article: John Howe (loyalist). I have also done work on this page as 209.17.183.249, 216.232.69.9, and 64.180.122.15. Is there any way that I can change these IP addresses to my user name? I will try to remember to log in before I start any work.
Thanks, AJJ (talk) 16:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! As for as I know of, there's no way that you could change those IP addresses to your user account. The easiest thing to do at home is to just click the "Remember Me" box, so you'll always be logged in. However, if you're editing at work or on any other public computer, don't click "Remember Me", as others may be able to access you're account, espeically if you don't log out. So, at work or on a public computer, you just need to remember to log in. Anyways, happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 20:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
List of wars 1945-1989
I have replied to one of your comments relating to the structure of Wikipedia's list of wars. You can see it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_wars_1945%E2%80%931989 Please read 114.72.189.94 (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, mate! And thanks a lot for the support! Happy editing! Laurinavicius (talk) 15:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I can't really edit it, because the other users don't want them edited. They seem to want them left as they are. But that doesn't make sense, does it?114.73.56.212 (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- What do you mean? -- Laurinavicius (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter
The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
DATE OF DEATH OF POET RAJA MEDHI ALI KHAN
RESPECTED SIR/MADAM, DATE OF DATH OF RAJA MEDHI ALI KHAN IS 1966 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.PLEASE CLARIFY AND OBLIGE THANKS VERY MUCH. Best regard Mirza Mohammad Yousaf Newyork MY E.MAIL [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.106.213 (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you!
Laurinavicius - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.
I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.
Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.
Thank you! 7 23:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Cereals - too many pages?
I was answering a question for a friend and found pages (or are they called "entries"?) for several topics - Semolina, Cream of Wheat, Malt-O-Meal Company, Wheatena, that seem to me would belong under the heading/title "Cereals". I have two questions: Is it OK for me to make those changes? and How do I make those changes? --Ngstanton (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there! First of all, they are officially and usually called articles, but pages and entires can be used as synonyms. Second, you can make any change you want, provided that they improve the article and the encyclopedia as a whole. Third, I'm not quite sure what specific changes you're suggesting to make; would you mind repeating it in different words so that I can catch on? Fourth, the way to make those changes is pretty simple, just click the edit button right above the text of the article, make your changes to the article, then click save, just like you did on this page. Good luck and happy editing! :) Laurinavicius (talk) 22:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi to you. Side note: Does your response mean you have "adopted" me or is adoption not that formal?
- Re the cereal question:
- There is a fairly complete article on "Cereal".
- "Semolina" is a cereal product usually made from wheat.
- Cream of Wheat, Wheatena and Farina are all Brand name items sold in grocery stores.
- Malt-O-Meal Company is a company and the article is about the company.
- From what I've learned so far, number four clearly does not belong as a standalone article and barely would qualify for inclusion in the "Cereal" article, number three could be included in the "Cereal" article as examples of cereal products but I don't think they qualify for standalone articles, number two, "semolina" clearly, at least to me, belongs under the Cereal Title.
- So am I right in these suppositions?
- And if so, how do I "move" an article? Cut and paste? or is there a more sophisticated tool?--Ngstanton (talk) 23:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I found the page on moving articles. No need to respond to the above. --NickStan 11:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngstanton (talk • contribs)
Help:English to Latin Translation
Hello! I need some help on English to Latin translation. Please help me to translate the following list of english words to Latin.
- Bishop of Rome
- Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
- Patriarch of Alexandria
- Patriarch of Antioch
- Patriarch of Jerusalem
Thank you. Amit6 (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your copyediting efforts during the May 2010 Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive, editing 26 articles with a combined total of 12,622 words, I hereby award you this Cleanup Barnstar. Congratulations and thank you for all your hard work! --Diannaa TALK 03:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC) |
Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –xenotalk 16:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News